These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10688307)

  • 1. Experimental cardiac tachyarrhythmias in guinea pigs.
    Malkin RA
    J Electrocardiol; 1999; 32 Suppl():84-6. PubMed ID: 10688307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of rapid pacing and T-wave scanning on the relation between the defibrillation and upper-limit-of-vulnerability dose-response curves.
    Malkin RA; Idriss SF; Walker RG; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1995 Sep; 92(5):1291-9. PubMed ID: 7648678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Defibrillation and the upper limit of vulnerability to fibrillation in a transthoracic guinea pig model.
    Li H; Malkin RA
    J Electrocardiol; 1999 Apr; 32(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 10338034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hemodynamic collapse, geometry, and the rapidly paced upper limit of ventricular vulnerability to fibrillation by T-wave stimulation.
    Malkin RA; Hoffmeister BK
    J Electrocardiol; 2000 Jul; 33(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 10954381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Open-thorax guinea pig model for defibrillation.
    Eynard JN; Malkin RA
    Lab Anim Sci; 1999 Dec; 49(6):628-33. PubMed ID: 10638498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation probability of success curves using a nonthoracotomy lead system.
    Souza JJ; Malkin RA; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1995 Feb; 91(4):1247-52. PubMed ID: 7850965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of pacing rate and timing of defibrillation shock on the relation between the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of vulnerability in open chest dogs.
    Chen PS; Feld GK; Mower MM; Peters BB
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Nov; 18(6):1555-63. PubMed ID: 1939961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of lidocaine on relation between defibrillation threshold and upper limit of vulnerability in open-chest dogs.
    Topham SL; Cha YM; Peters BB; Chen PS
    Circulation; 1992 Mar; 85(3):1146-51. PubMed ID: 1537112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Timing of the upper limit of vulnerability is different for monophasic and biphasic shocks: implications for the determination of the defibrillation threshold.
    Behrens S; Li C; Franz MR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2179-87. PubMed ID: 9309741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Relationship Between Cardiac Vulnerability and Restitution Properties of the Ventricular Activation Recovery Interval.
    Yamashita S; Yoshida A; Fukuzawa K; Nakanishi T; Matsumoto A; Konishi H; Ichibori H; Hyogo K; Imada H; Hirata K
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Jul; 26(7):768-73. PubMed ID: 25810143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of transvenous electrode polarity and waveform duration on the relationship between defibrillation threshold and upper limit of vulnerability.
    Huang J; KenKnight BH; Walcott GP; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1997 Aug; 96(4):1351-9. PubMed ID: 9286969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental verification of theoretical predictions concerning the optimum defibrillation waveform.
    Malkin RA; Jackson SR; Nguyen J; Yang Z; Guan D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Aug; 53(8):1492-8. PubMed ID: 16916083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrophysiological effects of monophasic and biphasic stimuli in normal and infarcted dogs.
    Wharton JM; Richard VJ; Murry CE; Dixon EG; Reimer KA; Meador J; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Sep; 13(9):1158-72. PubMed ID: 1700392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of the pacing site, procainamide, and lead configuration on the relationship between the upper limit of vulnerability and the defibrillation threshold.
    Fan W; Gotoh M; Chen PS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jun; 18(6):1279-84. PubMed ID: 7659583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biphasic waveforms for ventricular defibrillation: optimization of total pulse and second phase durations.
    Matula MH; Brooks MJ; Pan Q; Pless BD; Province RA; Echt DS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2154-62. PubMed ID: 9309738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Graded response and restitution hypotheses of ventricular vulnerability to fibrillation: insights into the mechanism of initiation of fibrillation.
    Karagueuzian HS; Chen PS
    J Electrocardiol; 1999; 32 Suppl():87-91. PubMed ID: 10688308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of inducing ventricular fibrillation with 50-Hz pacing versus T wave stimulation on the ability to defibrillate.
    Malkin RA; Johnson EE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 May; 21(5):1093-7. PubMed ID: 9604241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Random nature of fibrillation leads to the probabilistic nature of defibrillation.
    Wolf PD; Pendekanti R
    J Electrocardiol; 1999; 32 Suppl():100. PubMed ID: 10688310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Defibrillation success is associated with myocardial organization. Spatial coherence as a new method of quantifying the electrical organization of the heart.
    Hsia PW; Fendelander L; Harrington G; Damiano RJ
    J Electrocardiol; 1996; 29 Suppl():189-97. PubMed ID: 9238398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of ventricular vulnerability.
    Chen PS; Shibata N; Dixon EG; Martin RO; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1986 May; 73(5):1022-8. PubMed ID: 3698224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.