These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10688478)

  • 1. Seat back and head restraint response during low-speed rear-end automobile collisions.
    Lawrence JM; Siegmund GP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2000 Mar; 32(2):219-32. PubMed ID: 10688478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The response of human volunteers to rear-end impacts: the effect of head restraint properties.
    Tencer AF; Mirza S; Bensel K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Nov; 26(22):2432-40; discussion 2441-2. PubMed ID: 11707705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Internal loads in the cervical spine during motor vehicle rear-end impacts: the effect of acceleration and head-to-head restraint proximity.
    Tencer AF; Mirza S; Bensel K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Jan; 27(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 11805633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variability in vehicle and dummy responses in rear-end collisions.
    Siegmund GP; Heinrichs BE; Chimich DD; Lawrence J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Sep; 6(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 16087468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do "whiplash injuries" occur in low-speed rear impacts?
    Castro WH; Schilgen M; Meyer S; Weber M; Peuker C; Wörtler K
    Eur Spine J; 1997; 6(6):366-75. PubMed ID: 9455663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Report investigating the importance of head restraint positioning in reducing neck injury in rear impact.
    Maher J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2000 Mar; 32(2):299-305. PubMed ID: 10688486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of head restraint and occupant factors on peak head/neck kinematics in low-speed rear-end collisions.
    Siegmund GP; Heinrichs BE; Wheeler JB
    Accid Anal Prev; 1999 Jul; 31(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 10384232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of initial seated position in low speed rear-end impacts: a comparison with the TNO rear impact dummy (TRID) model.
    Venkataramana MP; Hans SA; Bawab SY; Keifer OP; Woodhouse ML; Layson PD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Mar; 6(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 15823879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An energy-absorbing sliding seat for reducing neck injury risks in rear impact--analysis for prototype built.
    Zhang X; Zhou Q
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016; 17(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 26148123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Real-world adjustments of driver seat and head restraint in Saab 9-3 vehicles.
    Carlsson A; Pipkorn L; Kullgren A; Svensson M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 27617749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of seat characteristics on occupant motion in low-speed rear impacts.
    Watanabe Y; Ichikawa H; Kayama O; Ono K; Kaneoka K; Inami S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2000 Mar; 32(2):243-50. PubMed ID: 10688480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Seat properties affecting neck responses in rear crashes: a reason why whiplash has increased.
    Viano DC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Sep; 4(3):214-27. PubMed ID: 14522646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of a 3-point harness restraint and car seat in whiplash-type lateral impacts.
    Kumar S; Ferrari R; Narayan Y; Jones T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jan; 31(1):E11-8. PubMed ID: 16395161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of seat foam and geometrical properties on BioRID P3 kinematic response to rear impacts.
    Szabo TJ; Voss DP; Welcher JB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Dec; 4(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 14630580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A study of cervical spine kinematics and joint capsule strain in rear impacts using a human FE model.
    Kitagawa Y; Yasuki T; Hasegawa J
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2006 Nov; 50():545-66. PubMed ID: 17311176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of anti-whiplash seats during low/moderate speed rear-end collisions.
    Mang DWH; Siegmund GP; Blouin JS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 32027520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationships between seat properties and human subject kinematics in rear impact tests.
    Welcher JB; Szabo TJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2001 May; 33(3):289-304. PubMed ID: 11235791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical spine curvature during simulated rear crashes with energy-absorbing seat.
    Ivancic PC; Xiao M
    Spine J; 2011 Mar; 11(3):224-33. PubMed ID: 21377605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effectiveness of active head restraint in preventing whiplash.
    Viano DC; Olsen S
    J Trauma; 2001 Nov; 51(5):959-69. PubMed ID: 11706347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of collision pulse properties on seven proposed whiplash injury criteria.
    Siegmund GP; Heinrichs BE; Chimich DD; DeMarco AL; Brault JR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Mar; 37(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 15667814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.