125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10689960)
1. [Pagers and breast cancer among female physicians].
Trolle D
Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Feb; 162(6):806-7. PubMed ID: 10689960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Electromagnetic fields and female breast cancer.
Feychting M; Forssén U
Cancer Causes Control; 2006 May; 17(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 16596310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Re: "Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields and breast cancer in men".
Jauchem JR
Am J Epidemiol; 1992 Jun; 135(12):1423-5. PubMed ID: 1510087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Occupational magnetic fields and female breast cancer: a case-control study using Swedish population registers and new exposure data.
Forssén UM; Rutqvist LE; Ahlbom A; Feychting M
Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 161(3):250-9. PubMed ID: 15671257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Occupational exposures to extremely low frequency magnetic fields and postmenopausal breast cancer.
Labrèche F; Goldberg MS; Valois MF; Nadon L; Richardson L; Lakhani R; Latreille B
Am J Ind Med; 2003 Dec; 44(6):643-52. PubMed ID: 14635241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Re: "Occupational magnetic fields and female breast cancer: a case-control study using Swedish population registers and new exposure data".
Erren TC
Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 162(4):392-3; author reply 393-4. PubMed ID: 16014780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Occupational risk factors for breast cancer in the epidemiological studies].
Pepłońska B; Szeszenia-Dabrowska N
Med Pr; 2001; 52(6):483-95. PubMed ID: 11928680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [International consensus on low-frequency electromagnetic fields: "possibly carcinogenic"].
Hansson Mild K; Hamnerius Y; Hardell L; Mattsson MO; Sandström M
Lakartidningen; 2001 Nov; 98(46):5188-91. PubMed ID: 11761570
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Do carcinogens in the hospital pose a risk to health-care workers?
Oncology (Williston Park); 1994 Mar; 8(3):74. PubMed ID: 8018484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Cellular telephone and risk of cancer?].
Johansen C; Olsen JH
Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Nov; 158(46):6624-6. PubMed ID: 8966832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Electromagnetic fields. Breast cancer link claimed, criticized.
Taubes G
Science; 1994 Jun; 264(5166):1658. PubMed ID: 8209240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Ionizing radiation and risk of breast cancer in women].
Tekkel MIu; Kolle KhA
Med Radiol (Mosk); 1986 Nov; 31(11):77-82. PubMed ID: 3537609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Biologically based study of magnetic field exposure and female breast cancer--will there be a sensible interpretation without information on a likely culprit?
Erren TC
Epidemiology; 2003 Jan; 14(1):129-30. PubMed ID: 12500066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Do electromagnetic fields or chemicals cause cancer?].
Lindskoug BA
Lakartidningen; 1993 May; 90(21):2028. PubMed ID: 8502045
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Risks for radiation-induced breast cancer: the debate continues.
Ullrich RL
Radiat Res; 1999 Feb; 151(2):123-4. PubMed ID: 9952295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [50-60 Hz electromagnetic fields and cancer risk].
Guénel P
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1997 Mar; 45(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 9173465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Catania resolution 2002.
Electromagn Biol Med; 2006; 25(4):201-2. PubMed ID: 17178579
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Long-term study shows increased risk. Cancer from cellular phone lines?].
Pickl S
MMW Fortschr Med; 2005 Nov; 147(47):14. PubMed ID: 16370187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of hormones in breast carcinogenesis: issues of relevance to female childhood cancer survivors.
Ganz PA
Med Pediatr Oncol; 2001 May; 36(5):514-8. PubMed ID: 11340605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benevento resolution 2006.
Electromagn Biol Med; 2006; 25(4):197-200. PubMed ID: 17178578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
