These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10691065)

  • 21. Randomized control trial of unconditional versus conditional incentives to increase study enrollment rates in participants at increased risk of lung cancer.
    Kumar AD; Durham DD; Lane L; Perera P; Rivera MP; Henderson LM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Jan; 141():11-17. PubMed ID: 34469801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Incentives for preventing smoking in children and adolescents.
    Hefler M; Liberato SC; Thomas DP
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jun; 6(6):CD008645. PubMed ID: 28585288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Incentives increased return rates but did not influence partial nonresponse or treatment outcome in a randomized trial.
    Dirmaier J; Harfst T; Koch U; Schulz H
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 60(12):1263-70. PubMed ID: 17998081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Controlled trial of the effect of length, incentives, and follow-up techniques on response to a mailed questionnaire.
    Hoffman SC; Burke AE; Helzlsouer KJ; Comstock GW
    Am J Epidemiol; 1998 Nov; 148(10):1007-11. PubMed ID: 9829873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Electronic reminders did not improve postal questionnaire response rates or response times: a randomized controlled trial.
    Man MS; Tilbrook HE; Jayakody S; Hewitt CE; Cox H; Cross B; Torgerson DJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):1001-4. PubMed ID: 21292441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An experimental test of the effect of incentives on recruitment of ethnically diverse colorectal cancer cases and their first-degree relatives into a research study.
    Maxwell AE; Bastani R; Glenn BA; Mojica CM; Chang LC
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Oct; 18(10):2620-5. PubMed ID: 19755646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Certified mail fails to reach an Emergency Department population.
    Thompson JR; Stephens S; Summers RL
    J Emerg Med; 2004 Nov; 27(4):329-31. PubMed ID: 15498611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Contingency management in cocaine abusers: a dose-effect comparison of goods-based versus cash-based incentives.
    Vandrey R; Bigelow GE; Stitzer ML
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2007 Aug; 15(4):338-43. PubMed ID: 17696680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. National survey of physicians to determine the effect of unconditional incentives on response rates of physician postal surveys.
    Abdulaziz K; Brehaut J; Taljaard M; Émond M; Sirois MJ; Lee JS; Wilding L; Perry JJ
    BMJ Open; 2015 Feb; 5(2):e007166. PubMed ID: 25694460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Facilitating HIV/AIDS and HIV testing literacy for emergency department patients: a randomized, controlled, trial.
    Merchant RC; Liu T; Clark MA; Carey MP
    BMC Emerg Med; 2018 Jul; 18(1):21. PubMed ID: 29986662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prepayment was superior to postpayment cash incentives in a randomized postal survey among physicians.
    Leung GM; Johnston JM; Saing H; Tin KY; Wong IO; Ho LM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 57(8):777-84. PubMed ID: 15485729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of a mailed brochure on appointment-keeping for screening colonoscopy: a randomized trial.
    Denberg TD; Coombes JM; Byers TE; Marcus AC; Feinberg LE; Steiner JF; Ahnen DJ
    Ann Intern Med; 2006 Dec; 145(12):895-900. PubMed ID: 17179058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Response to mail surveys: effect of a request to explain refusal to participate. The ARIC Study Investigators.
    Shahar E; Bisgard KM; Folsom AR
    Epidemiology; 1993 Sep; 4(5):480-2. PubMed ID: 8399698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fate of incorrectly addressed mailed questionnaires.
    Sandler RS; Holland KL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1990; 43(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 2319279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Enhancing attitudes and intentions in prospective blood donors: evaluation of a new donor recruitment brochure.
    France CR; Montalva R; France JL; Trost Z
    Transfusion; 2008 Mar; 48(3):526-30. PubMed ID: 18067498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Development and evaluation of written patient information for endoscopic procedures.
    Aabakken L; Baasland I; Lygren I; Osnes M
    Endoscopy; 1997 Jan; 29(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 9083732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prescribing wellness: a case study exploring the use of health information brochures.
    Jamison JR
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2004 May; 27(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 15148465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Efficacy of Direct Mail, Patient Navigation, and Incentives for Increasing Mammography and Colonoscopy in the Medicaid Population: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Slater JS; Parks MJ; Nelson CL; Hughes KD
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2018 Sep; 27(9):1047-1056. PubMed ID: 29891726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dermatologist response rates to a mailed questionnaire: a randomized trial of monetary incentives.
    Wan J; Abuabara K; Shin DB; Troxel AB; Bebo BF; Gelfand JM
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2012 Jan; 66(1):e18-20. PubMed ID: 22036576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Do government brochures affect physical activity cognition? A pilot study of Canada's physical activity guide to healthy active living.
    Kliman AM; Rhodes R
    Psychol Health Med; 2008 Aug; 13(4):415-22. PubMed ID: 18825580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.