These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10691527)
1. Patents. Company gets rights to cloned human embryos. Vogel G Science; 2000 Jan; 287(5453):559. PubMed ID: 10691527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Britain grants embryo cloning patent. N Y Times Web; 2000 Jan; ():C9. PubMed ID: 11873785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Some reflections on an international convention on the banning of human cloning and related patents. Eugui DV; Spennemann C J World Intellect Prop; 2003 May; 6(3):485-505. PubMed ID: 15986547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The promise in selling stem cells. Pollack A N Y Times Web; 2001 Aug; ():BU1, BU11. PubMed ID: 12155690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A versatile cell line raises scientific hopes, legal questions. Marshall E Science; 1998 Nov; 282(5391):1014-5. PubMed ID: 9841438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Koreans report ease in cloning for stem cells; work on human embryos; researchers say goal is better medicine, not reproduction. Kolata G N Y Times Web; 2005 May; ():A1, A22. PubMed ID: 15948340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The attack of the clones: patent law and stem cell research. Rimmer M J Law Med; 2003 May; 10(4):488-505. PubMed ID: 12852321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. US debate on human cloning side tracked by stem cell patent disclosure. Barbour V Lancet; 2002 Feb; 359(9304):416. PubMed ID: 11844531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Stem cell technologies: regulation, patents and problems. Then SN J Law Med; 2004 Nov; 12(2):188-204. PubMed ID: 15575321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Governing genetics: reifying choice and progress. Kerr A New Genet Soc; 2003 Aug; 22(2):143-58. PubMed ID: 15282910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal trends in bioethics. Davis DS J Clin Ethics; 2000; 11(1):94-5. PubMed ID: 11645768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Patent on stem cell studies puts U.S. officials in bind. Stolberg SG N Y Times Web; 2001 Aug; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 12155477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Who owns my DNA?: the national and international intellectual property law on human embryonic tissue and cloning. Knowles SM; Adams SD Cumberland Law Rev; 2001-2002; 32(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 12645552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Brain gain. Cohen P; Ainsworth C New Sci; 2001 Jun; 170(2297):5. PubMed ID: 11838474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. No research on cloning of embryos, Geron says. Wade N N Y Times Web; 1999 Jun; ():A21. PubMed ID: 11648124 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Science policy and the law: reproductive and therapeutic cloning. Knowles LP N Y Univ J Legis Public Policy; 2000-2001; 4(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 15011709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. U.N. to consider whether to ban some, or all, forms of cloning of human embryos. Semple K N Y Times Web; 2003 Nov; ():A11. PubMed ID: 14621711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. First UK patents for cloning issued to creators of Dolly the sheep. Mayor S BMJ; 2000 Jan; 320(7230):270. PubMed ID: 10650016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Bio-patents, law and ethics. Critical analysis of the EU biotechnology directive. Van Overwalle G Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2003; (19):187-203. PubMed ID: 15032104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Washington Insider: Congressional impasse on human cloning. Doerflinger RM Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 15192847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]