355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10691540)
1. Oversight mechanisms for clinical research.
Snyderman R; Holmes EW
Science; 2000 Jan; 287(5453):595-7. PubMed ID: 10691540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Shutdown of research at Duke sends a message.
Marshall E
Science; 1999 May; 284(5418):1246. PubMed ID: 10383299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Research ethics. NIH examines standards for consent.
Marshall E
Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5370):1688. PubMed ID: 9660706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Duke's hazards. Did medical experiments put patients needlessly at risk?
Kaplan S; Brownlee S
US News World Rep; 1999 May; 126(20):66-8, 70. PubMed ID: 10387890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Waivers proposed for emergency studies.
Wolfgang L
Science; 1995 Oct; 270(5233):25-6. PubMed ID: 7569946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomedical ethics. HHS plans to overhaul clinical research rules.
Marshall E
Science; 2000 May; 288(5470):1315-6. PubMed ID: 10847836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Panel faults research consent process.
Marshall E
Science; 1995 Oct; 270(5233):25. PubMed ID: 7569945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Office for Protection from Research Risks.
Porter JP
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1992 Sep; 2(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 10121091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Protecting research subjects--what must be done.
Shalala D
N Engl J Med; 2000 Sep; 343(11):808-10. PubMed ID: 10984573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. IRBs search for answers and support during a time of institutional change.
Phillips DF
JAMA; 2000 Feb; 283(6):729-30. PubMed ID: 10683041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved protection for human research subjects.
Marwick C
JAMA; 1998 Feb; 279(5):344-5. PubMed ID: 9459454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomedical ethics. Penn report, agency heads home in on clinical research.
Marshall E
Science; 2000 Jun; 288(5471):1558-9. PubMed ID: 10858125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Keeping research subjects out of harm's way.
Ellis GB
JAMA; 1999 Nov; 282(20):1963-5. PubMed ID: 10580465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
American Society of Clinical Oncology
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical ethics. Principles for human gene therapy studies.
Friedmann T
Science; 2000 Mar; 287(5461):2163-5. PubMed ID: 10744537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Legal judgments and informed consent in geriatric research.
Dubler NN
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1987 Jun; 35(6):545-9. PubMed ID: 3571807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. NIH ethics office clamps down on Duke...as basic scientists feel the pinch in LA.
Wadman M
Nature; 1999 May; 399(6733):190. PubMed ID: 10353232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Update on Waiving Informed Consent in Emergency Research.
McCarthy CR
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1995 Dec; 5(4):385-6. PubMed ID: 10153763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Lay participation in medical policy making. II. Human experimentation committees: professional or representative?
Veatch RM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1975 Oct; 5(5):31-40. PubMed ID: 1184371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. FDA gets feedback on informed consent waiver.
Marwick C
JAMA; 1996 Feb; 275(5):347. PubMed ID: 8568998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
