These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10692835)

  • 1. Characteristics of proportional analysis for soft tissue facial profile: epidemiological possibilities of measurement item reduction.
    Kishi S
    J Oral Sci; 1999 Sep; 41(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 10692835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Size and shape of soft-tissue facial profile: effects of age, gender, and skeletal class.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Nov; 34(6):498-504. PubMed ID: 9431467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile.
    Nanda RS; Meng H; Kapila S; Goorhuis J
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(3):177-90. PubMed ID: 2389850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in the facial profile following correction for mandibular prognathism.
    Fanibunda KB
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1989 Aug; 27(4):277-86. PubMed ID: 2765455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proportional analysis of the facial profile in natural head position in Caucasian and Chinese children.
    Lundström A; Cooke MS
    Br J Orthod; 1991 Feb; 18(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 2025622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Establishment of South Indian soft tissue cephalometric norms using profile angles and esthetic analysis.
    Biradar AK; Madanagowda SB
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e104-13. PubMed ID: 21490979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cephalometric analysis of dentofacial normals.
    Scheideman GB; Bell WH; Legan HL; Finn RA; Reisch JS
    Am J Orthod; 1980 Oct; 78(4):404-20. PubMed ID: 6933849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults.
    Uysal T; Yagci A; Basciftci FA; Sisman Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 19482876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soft tissue morphology of Jordanian adolescents.
    Hamdan AM
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 19852644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method.
    Anic-Milosevic S; Mestrovic S; Prlić A; Slaj M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 19447641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in facial profile of young adults with normal occlusion: a longitudinal study.
    Tibana RH; Palagi LM; Carneiro MS; Almeida MA; Miguel JA
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 18575305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orthodontic soft-tissue parameters: a comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and the 3dMD imaging system.
    Metzger TE; Kula KS; Eckert GJ; Ghoneima AA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):672-81. PubMed ID: 24182583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The use of regression functions for reconstruction of the cutaneous profile, from facial bone elements].
    Deloison Y; Fenart R
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1997 Nov; 98 Suppl 1():85-8. PubMed ID: 9471707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile.
    Fernández-Riveiro P; Smyth-Chamosa E; Suárez-Quintanilla D; Suárez-Cunqueiro M
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Aug; 25(4):393-9. PubMed ID: 12938846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soft tissue adaptability to hard tissues in facial profiles.
    Kasai K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):674-84. PubMed ID: 9637571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Profile planning based on alterations in the positions of the bases of the facial thirds.
    Obwegeser HL; Marentette LJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1986 Apr; 44(4):302-11. PubMed ID: 3457125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Soft tissue cephalometric norms for a North Indian population group using Legan and Burstone analysis.
    Jain P; Kalra JP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 40(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 20965694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of the anteroposterior soft-tissue contour of the lower facial third in the ideal young adult.
    Spradley FL; Jacobs JD; Crowe DP
    Am J Orthod; 1981 Mar; 79(3):316-25. PubMed ID: 6938139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Anatolian Turkish adults.
    Kale-Varlk S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 19(6):1481-6. PubMed ID: 19098536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study of 2 software programs for predicting profile changes in Class III patients having double-jaw orthognathic surgery.
    Magro-Filho O; Magro-Ernica N; Queiroz TP; Aranega AM; Garcia IR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):452.e1-5; discussion 452-3. PubMed ID: 20362896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.