These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10692899)
1. Multicentre research ethics committees: have they helped? Larcombe I; Mott M J R Soc Med; 1999 Oct; 92(10):500-1. PubMed ID: 10692899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Responses of local research ethics committees to a study with approval from a multicentre research ethics committee. Lux AL; Edwards SW; Osborne JP BMJ; 2000 Apr; 320(7243):1182-3. PubMed ID: 10784542 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The trouble with ethics committees. Meade TW J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1994; 28(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 7802766 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study. Tully J; Ninis N; Booy R; Viner R BMJ; 2000 Apr; 320(7243):1179-82. PubMed ID: 10784541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Should there be an accredited ethics committee system for centralised review of multicentre clinical research? Beran RG Med J Aust; 1998 Feb; 168(4):174-6. PubMed ID: 9507714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Local research ethics committees. Report of the 2nd National Conference. Moran J J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1992 Oct; 26(4):423-31. PubMed ID: 1359130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The ethics of research ethics committees. Nicholl J BMJ; 2000 Apr; 320(7243):1217. PubMed ID: 10784570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Costs of seeking ethics approval before and after the introduction of multicentre research ethics committees. Dunn NR; Arscott A; Mann RD J R Soc Med; 2000 Oct; 93(10):511-2. PubMed ID: 11064687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multicentre research ethics committees: has the cure been worse than the disease? No, but idiosyncracies and obstructions to good research must be removed. Alberti KG BMJ; 2000 Apr; 320(7243):1157-8. PubMed ID: 10784526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The ethics approval process for multisite research studies in Australia: changes sought by the Australian Genomics initiative. Haas MA; Boughtwood TF; Quinn MC; Med J Aust; 2019 Nov; 211(10):440-444.e1. PubMed ID: 31734945 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Local research ethics committees: hindrance or help? Beech BA; Robinson J Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Oct; 102(10):842. PubMed ID: 7547748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethical review of multi-centre research. Horwitz R Bull Med Ethics; 1994 Oct; No. 102():13-5. PubMed ID: 11654130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Are ethical committees reliable? Hotopf M; Wessely S; Noah N J R Soc Med; 1995 Jan; 88(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 7884767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unjustified exclusion of elderly people from studies submitted to research ethics committee for approval: descriptive study. Bayer A; Tadd W BMJ; 2000 Oct; 321(7267):992-3. PubMed ID: 11039965 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A national research ethics committee? Alderson P Bull Med Ethics; 1995 Apr; No. 107():13-6. PubMed ID: 11654315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Guidelines for local research ethics committees: distinguishing between patient and population research in the Multicentre Research Project. Benster R; Pollock AM Public Health; 1993 Jan; 107(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 8475241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. One year on: LRECs & MRECs in the West Country: meeting report. Ashcroft R Bull Med Ethics; 1998 Nov; No. 143():8-11. PubMed ID: 11657621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Local research ethics committees. Alberti KG BMJ; 1995 Sep; 311(7006):639-40. PubMed ID: 7549620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Should there be an accredited ethics committee system for centralised review of multicentre clinical research? Cohen M Med J Aust; 1998 May; 168(10):528. PubMed ID: 9631688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]