These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10693066)

  • 21. Five-year risk of interval-invasive second breast cancer.
    Lee JM; Buist DS; Houssami N; Dowling EC; Halpern EF; Gazelle GS; Lehman CD; Henderson LM; Hubbard RA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Jul; 107(7):. PubMed ID: 25904721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ultrasound for breast cancer screening and staging.
    Gordon PB
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2002 May; 40(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 12117185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of baseline breast density on breast cancer incidence, stage, mortality, and screening parameters: 25-year follow-up of a Swedish mammographic screening.
    Chiu SY; Duffy S; Yen AM; Tabár L; Smith RA; Chen HH
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2010 May; 19(5):1219-28. PubMed ID: 20406961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Estimated risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening for young BRCA mutation carriers.
    Berrington de Gonzalez A; Berg CD; Visvanathan K; Robson M
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Feb; 101(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 19176458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result: relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factors.
    Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Wray LA; Helvie MA
    Radiology; 2004 Jan; 230(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 14695385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mammographic screening in women with a family history of breast cancer: some results from the Swedish two-county trial.
    Nixon RM; Pharoah P; Tabar L; Krusemo UB; Duffy SW; Prevost TC; Chen HH
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2000 Aug; 48(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 11011299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of screening mammography on the surgery of breast cancer in Finland: a population-based analysis during the years 1985-2004.
    Paajanen H; Kyhälä L; Varjo R; Rantala S
    Am Surg; 2006 Feb; 72(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 16536250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The relationship of mammographic density and age: implications for breast cancer screening.
    Checka CM; Chun JE; Schnabel FR; Lee J; Toth H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Mar; 198(3):W292-5. PubMed ID: 22358028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical outcomes of modelling mammography screening strategies.
    Yaffe MJ; Mittmann N; Lee P; Tosteson AN; Trentham-Dietz A; Alagoz O; Stout NK
    Health Rep; 2015 Dec; 26(12):9-15. PubMed ID: 26676234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
    Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interval breast cancers: absolute and proportional incidence and blinded review in a community mammographic screening program.
    Carbonaro LA; Azzarone A; Paskeh BB; Brambilla G; Brunelli S; Calori A; Caumo F; Malerba P; Menicagli L; Sconfienza LM; Vadalà G; Brambilla G; Fantini L; Ciatto S; Sardanelli F
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):e84-91. PubMed ID: 24369953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The natural history of invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography.
    Zahl PH; Maehlen J; Welch HG
    Arch Intern Med; 2008 Nov; 168(21):2311-6. PubMed ID: 19029493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mammography screening methods and diagnostic results.
    Thurfjell E
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1995; 395():1-22. PubMed ID: 7839866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Assessment of mammography screening and its introduction in Germany in the Statutory Early Diagnosis Program].
    von Fournier D
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1999; 121(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 10209861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography: 1. Further confirmation with extended data.
    Swedish Organised Service Screening Evaluation Group
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Jan; 15(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 16434585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Overdiagnosis in screening: is the increase in breast cancer incidence rates a cause for concern?
    Paci E; Warwick J; Falini P; Duffy SW
    J Med Screen; 2004; 11(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 15006110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bilateral breast cancer: early detection with mammography.
    Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Lai NE; Paramagul C
    Radiology; 1995 Aug; 196(2):427-31. PubMed ID: 7617856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival.
    Porter GJ; Evans AJ; Cornford EJ; Burrell HC; James JJ; Lee AH; Chakrabarti J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):676-83. PubMed ID: 17312053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Screening for breast cancer in women aged under 50: mode of detection, incidence, fatality, and histology.
    Tabar L; Fagerberg G; Chen HH; Duffy SW; Gad A
    J Med Screen; 1995; 2(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 7497163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Breast cancer in New South Wales in 1972-1995: tumor size and the impact of mammographic screening.
    Kricker A; Farac K; Smith D; Sweeny A; McCredie M; Armstrong BK
    Int J Cancer; 1999 Jun; 81(6):877-80. PubMed ID: 10362133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.