These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10693320)

  • 1. A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools.
    Steadman HJ; Silver E; Monahan J; Appelbaum PS; Robbins PC; Mulvey EP; Grisso T; Roth LH; Banks S
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Feb; 24(1):83-100. PubMed ID: 10693320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Applying a forensic actuarial assessment (the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide) to nonforensic patients.
    Harris GT; Rice ME; Camilleri JA
    J Interpers Violence; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1063-74. PubMed ID: 15296617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Statistical prediction methods in violence risk assessment and its application].
    Liu YY; Hu JM; Yang M; Li XS
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Jun; 29(3):216-21. PubMed ID: 24303769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk of violence by psychiatric patients: beyond the "actuarial versus clinical" assessment debate.
    Buchanan A
    Psychiatr Serv; 2008 Feb; 59(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 18245161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding Clinicians' Use of Cues When Assessing the Future Risk of Violence: A Clinical Judgement Analysis in the Psychiatric Setting.
    Brown B; Rakow T
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2016; 23(2):125-41. PubMed ID: 25652696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Actuarial risk assessment models: a review of critical issues related to violence and sex-offender recidivism assessments.
    Sreenivasan S; Kirkish P; Garrick T; Weinberger LE; Phenix A
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(4):438-48. PubMed ID: 11196254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sex offenders and actuarial risk assessments: ethical considerations.
    Campbell TW
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(2):269-79. PubMed ID: 12645049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Threat assessment: defining an approach for evaluating risk of targeted violence.
    Borum R; Fein R; Vossekuil B; Berglund J
    Behav Sci Law; 1999; 17(3):323-37. PubMed ID: 10481132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are violence risk assessment tools clinically useful?
    Carroll A
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2007 Apr; 41(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 17464716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of actuarials at civil commitment hearings to predict the likelihood of future sexual violence.
    Berlin FS; Galbreath NW; Geary B; McGlone G
    Sex Abuse; 2003 Oct; 15(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 14571541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Men in his category have a 50% likelihood, but which half is he in? Comments on Berlin, Galbreath, Geary, and McGlone.
    Harris G
    Sex Abuse; 2003 Oct; 15(4):389-92. PubMed ID: 14571543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Forensic assessment of violence risk].
    Pujol Robinat A; Mohíno Justes S; Gómez-Durán EL
    Med Clin (Barc); 2014 Mar; 142 Suppl 2():16-23. PubMed ID: 24913749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of framing actuarial risk probabilities on involuntary civil commitment decisions.
    Scurich N; John RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Apr; 35(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 20145984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developing a clinically useful actuarial tool for assessing violence risk.
    Monahan J; Steadman HJ; Appelbaum PS; Robbins PC; Mulvey EP; Silver E; Roth LH; Grisso T
    Br J Psychiatry; 2000 Apr; 176():312-9. PubMed ID: 10827877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictive accuracy of the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 for violence in forensic psychiatric wards in Japan.
    Arai K; Takano A; Nagata T; Hirabayashi N
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2017 Dec; 27(5):409-420. PubMed ID: 27296667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Another look at the (im-)precision of individual risk estimates made using actuarial risk assessment instruments.
    Hart SD; Cooke DJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(1):81-102. PubMed ID: 23322617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Patients in forensic and general psychiatry. Do risk assessment measures detect differing risks of future violence?].
    Lincoln TM; Hodgins S; Jöckel D; Freese R; Born P; Eucker S; Schmidt P; Gretenkord L; Müller-Isberner R
    Nervenarzt; 2006 May; 77(5):576-86. PubMed ID: 15944853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From group data to useful probabilities: the relevance of actuarial risk assessment in individual instances.
    Mossman D
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Mar; 43(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 25770285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unguided clinical and actuarial assessment of re-offending risk: a direct comparison with sex offenders in Denmark.
    Bengtson S; Långström N
    Sex Abuse; 2007 Jun; 19(2):135-53. PubMed ID: 17534713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of confidence on the accuracy of structured professional and actuarial violence risk judgments in a sample of forensic psychiatric patients.
    Douglas KS; Ogloff JR
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Dec; 27(6):573-87. PubMed ID: 14724957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.