These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10693321)

  • 1. The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA) Guide: reliability and validity in adult male offenders.
    Kropp PR; Hart SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Feb; 24(1):101-18. PubMed ID: 10693321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interrater reliability, concurrent validity, and predictive validity of the risk for sexual violence protocol.
    Vargen LM; Jackson KJ; Hart SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Feb; 44(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 31697098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Risk assessment for domestic violence].
    Kilvinger F; Rossegger A; Urbaniok F; Endrass J
    Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2012 Jun; 80(6):312-9. PubMed ID: 21590649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment and management of risk for intimate partner violence by police officers using the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide.
    Belfrage H; Strand S; Storey JE; Gibas AL; Kropp PR; Hart SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Feb; 36(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 22471386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigating racial disparities in violence risk assessment using the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide-Version 3 (SARA-V3): Structured professional judgment ratings and recidivism among Indigenous and non-Indigenous individuals.
    Hogan NR; Corăbian G
    Psychol Assess; 2024 May; 36(5):339-350. PubMed ID: 38512165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incremental prediction of intimate partner violence: An examination of three risk measures.
    Olver ME; Jung S
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):440-453. PubMed ID: 28650186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying subtypes of spousal assaulters Using the B-SAFER.
    Thijssen J; de Ruiter C
    J Interpers Violence; 2011 May; 26(7):1307-21. PubMed ID: 20522890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychometric properties of the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment from samples of people having perpetrated intimate partner violence.
    Allard V; Higgs T; Slight M
    Trauma Violence Abuse; 2024 Jul; ():15248380241262275. PubMed ID: 39044383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing risk for inpatient physical violence in a female forensic psychiatric sample - comparing HCR-20v2 with the female additional manual to the HCR-20v2.
    Strand SJM; Selenius H
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2019; 73(4-5):248-256. PubMed ID: 31081436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive validity of the MMPI-2 Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales in a batterers' intervention program.
    Sellbom M; Ben-Porath YS; Baum LJ; Erez E; Gregory C
    J Pers Assess; 2008 Mar; 90(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 18444106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An investigation of reliability and validity of the LS/CMI with French offenders.
    Bertsch I; Guay JP; Réveillère C; Telle E; Douceron H; Dubuisson M; Courtois R; Pham T
    Encephale; 2023 Oct; 49(5):460-465. PubMed ID: 35973848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interrater reliability of Violence Risk Appraisal Guide scores provided in Canadian criminal proceedings.
    Edens JF; Penson BN; Ruchensky JR; Cox J; Smith ST
    Psychol Assess; 2016 Dec; 28(12):1543-1549. PubMed ID: 27046274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive validity of dynamic factors: assessing violence risk in forensic psychiatric inpatients.
    Wilson CM; Desmarais SL; Nicholls TL; Hart SD; Brink J
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Dec; 37(6):377-88. PubMed ID: 23815092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does using nonnumerical terms to describe risk aid violence risk communication? Clinician agreement and decision making.
    Zoe Hilton N; Carter AM; Harris GT; Sharpe AJ
    J Interpers Violence; 2008 Feb; 23(2):171-88. PubMed ID: 18162635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) during residential treatment.
    Lodewijks HP; Doreleijers TA; de Ruiter C; Borum R
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 18508122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive validity of the structured assessment of violence risk in youth: A 4-year follow-up.
    Gammelgård M; Koivisto AM; Eronen M; Kaltiala-Heino R
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2015 Jul; 25(3):192-206. PubMed ID: 25042997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychopathy (PCL-R) in a forensic psychiatric sample of homicide offenders: some reliability issues.
    Laurell J; Dåderman AM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 17157912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-validation of the risk matrix 2000 sexual and violent scales.
    Craig LA; Beech A; Browne KD
    J Interpers Violence; 2006 May; 21(5):612-33. PubMed ID: 16574636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recidivism in female offenders: PCL-R lifestyle factor and VRAG show predictive validity in a German sample.
    Eisenbarth H; Osterheider M; Nedopil N; Stadtland C
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(5):575-84. PubMed ID: 22718134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Forensic assessment of violence risk].
    Pujol Robinat A; Mohíno Justes S; Gómez-Durán EL
    Med Clin (Barc); 2014 Mar; 142 Suppl 2():16-23. PubMed ID: 24913749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.