These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10693523)

  • 1. [Accreditation. Participation of the consumers in the evaluation of satisfaction].
    Ruhl J
    Soins Psychiatr; 1999; (201):21-2. PubMed ID: 10693523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient satisfaction: methodological issues and research findings.
    Westbrook JI
    Aust Health Rev; 1993; 16(1):75-88. PubMed ID: 10127675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Involving service users in quality initiatives.
    Nurs Stand; 1996 Sep; 10(52):32-3. PubMed ID: 8949151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Establishment of accreditation. The patient's expectations].
    Boiteux A
    Soins; 1998 Apr; (624):24-6. PubMed ID: 9633458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Complaint intensity and health care services.
    Dolinsky AL
    J Health Care Mark; 1995; 15(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 10144666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Consumer participation in the shaping of clinical quality assurance. A handling-oriented study of patient satisfaction].
    Haga HJ; Meyer HS; Langnes A; Olaussen O; Røysland AS; Haakstad W
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1995 Jun; 115(15):1857-60. PubMed ID: 7638837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Accreditation, a landmark].
    Marchant P
    Soins Psychiatr; 1999; (201):4-5. PubMed ID: 10693518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Patient participation in the Cochrane Collaboration: how can patients/consumers actively participate in a worldwide Cochrane Review Group?].
    Richter B; Bandeira-Echtler E
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2005; 99(6):373-5. PubMed ID: 16121653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Accreditation, for whom, why and how?].
    Witmann MF
    Soins; 1999 Nov; (640):20-5. PubMed ID: 10909389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Quality of care from the patient's point of view. Was the care first rate?].
    Renn M
    Krankenpfl Soins Infirm; 1998 Sep; 91(9):18-21. PubMed ID: 9784682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Users' perspective inclusion in mental health services evaluation].
    Ardila S
    Vertex; 2011; 22(95):49-55. PubMed ID: 21505646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of health care professionals' self-assessments of standards of care and patients' opinions on the care they received in hospital: observational study.
    Durieux P; Bissery A; Dubois S; Gasquet I; Coste J
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2004 Jun; 13(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 15175490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring quality: patients as consumers, suppliers. A nephrologist's viewpoint.
    Kurtin PS
    Nephrol News Issues; 1991 Oct; 5(10):19, 25. PubMed ID: 1956410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Perinatal care: advantages and disadvantages of network functioning. Analysis and point-of-view of Quality Assurance General Regime].
    Marty M
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1998 Dec; 27(2 Suppl):224-8. PubMed ID: 10049005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality improvement in health care: is the patient still left out?
    Lehr H; Strosberg M
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1991 Oct; 17(10):326-9. PubMed ID: 1745534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Clinical leaders' and staff's assessment of the current quality related to the patient pathways and expectations of and knowledge about accreditation--a baseline evaluation in Copenhagen County].
    Gut R; Knudsen JL; Freil M; Jensen AJ
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Nov; 168(46):3993-7. PubMed ID: 17125652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The questionnaire as an instrument of quality assurance].
    Scholz N
    Osterr Krankenpflegez; 1997 Nov; 50(11):32-4. PubMed ID: 9470762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Patient preferences or cost-effectiveness? Priorities are highly affected by introduction of economic dimension].
    Eckerlund I; Eklöf J; Nathorst-Böös J
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Dec; 97(49):5782-6, 5788. PubMed ID: 11188037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health management information system: a tool to gauge patient satisfaction and quality of care.
    Shaikh BT; Rabbani F
    East Mediterr Health J; 2005; 11(1-2):192-8. PubMed ID: 16532688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Quality control in the national health service. Patients' experiences of hospitals' quality].
    Freil M; Knudsen JL
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 May; 166(19):1796-9. PubMed ID: 15174431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.