142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10695457)
1. Optimization of transvenous coil position for active can defibrillation thresholds.
Gold MR; Olsovsky MR; DeGroot PJ; Cuello C; Shorofsky SR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Jan; 11(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 10695457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system.
Rashba EJ; Farasat M; Kirk MM; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):617-20. PubMed ID: 16836709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lead system optimization for transvenous defibrillation.
Gold MR; Foster AH; Shorofsky SR
Am J Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 80(9):1163-7. PubMed ID: 9359543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lack of benefit of an active pectoral pulse generator on atrial defibrillation thresholds.
Gold MR; Shorofsky SR; Bouhouch R; Joy RA; Kirby DS; Osman AF; Rashba EJ
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2002 Apr; 13(4):332-5. PubMed ID: 12033348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of atrial defibrillation with a dual-coil, active pectoral lead system.
Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 15(7):790-4. PubMed ID: 15250864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective, randomized comparison in humans of a unipolar defibrillation system with that using an additional superior vena cava electrode.
Bardy GH; Dolack GL; Kudenchuk PJ; Poole JE; Mehra R; Johnson G
Circulation; 1994 Mar; 89(3):1090-3. PubMed ID: 8124794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Atrial defibrillation thresholds of electrode configurations available to an atrioventricular defibrillator.
Benser ME; Walcott GP; Killingsworth CR; Girouard SD; Morris MM; Ideker RE
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2001 Aug; 12(8):957-64. PubMed ID: 11513449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of single- and dual-coil active pectoral defibrillation lead systems.
Gold MR; Olsovsky MR; Pelini MA; Peters RW; Shorofsky SR
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1998 May; 31(6):1391-4. PubMed ID: 9581739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal electrode position for transvenous defibrillation: a prospective randomized study.
Stajduhar KC; Ott GY; Kron J; McAnulty JH; Oliver RP; Reynolds BT; Adler SW; Halperin BD
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Jan; 27(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 8522716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distal right ventricular coil position reduces defibrillation thresholds.
Rashba EJ; Bonner M; Wilson J; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 Oct; 14(10):1036-40. PubMed ID: 14521655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimization of superior vena cava coil position and usage for transvenous defibrillation.
Gold M; Val-Mejias J; Leman RB; Tummala R; Goyal S; Kluger J; Kroll M; Oza A
Heart Rhythm; 2008 Mar; 5(3):394-9. PubMed ID: 18313597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Atrial defibrillation with a transvenous lead: a randomized comparison of active can shocking pathways.
Cooklin M; Olsovsky MR; Brockman RG; Shorofsky SR; Gold MR
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Aug; 34(2):358-62. PubMed ID: 10440146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective, randomized, comparison in patients between a pectoral unipolar defibrillation system and that using an additional inferior vena cava electrode.
Favale S; Dicandia CD; Tunzi P; Rizzon P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Aug; 22(8):1140-5. PubMed ID: 10461288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of anodal electrode position on transvenous defibrillation efficacy in humans: a prospective randomized comparison.
Markewitz A; Kaulbach H; Mattke S; Müller D; Bernutz C; Hoffmann E; Weinhold C; Steinbeck G; Reichart B
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2193-9. PubMed ID: 9309743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using dual, triple, and quadruple electrode systems.
Munsif AN; Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Matthew P; Giorgberidze I; Kaushik RR; Mehra R
Am J Cardiol; 1997 Jun; 79(12):1632-9. PubMed ID: 9202354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical predictors of atrial defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, active pectoral lead system.
Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Brown T; Peters RW; Gold MR
Heart Rhythm; 2005 Jan; 2(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 15851265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of electrode configuration and capacitor size on internal atrial defibrillation threshold using leads currently used for ventricular defibrillation.
Neri R; Palermo P; Cesario AS; Baragli D; Amici E; Laudadio MT; De Rosa A; DeSeta F; Mongeon L; Gambelli G
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 3(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 10387142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using an axillary or a pectoral thoracic electrode location.
Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Raju R; Mathew P; Mehra R
Circulation; 1993 Dec; 88(6):2655-60. PubMed ID: 8252676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coronary sinus electrode does not reduce atrial defibrillation thresholds.
Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Scheiner A; Peters RW; Ma C; Gold MR
Heart Rhythm; 2006 Jun; 3(6):647-52. PubMed ID: 16731464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transvenous biventricular defibrillation.
Meisel E; Butter C; Philippon F; Higgins S; Strickberger SA; Smith J; Hahn S; Michel U; Schubert B; Pfeiffer D
Am J Cardiol; 2000 Nov; 86(9A):76K-85K. PubMed ID: 11084104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
