168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10695530)
1. Classification of malignant and benign masses based on hybrid ART2LDA approach.
Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Dec; 18(12):1178-87. PubMed ID: 10695530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of border information in the classification of mammographic masses.
Varela C; Timp S; Karssemeijer N
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(2):425-41. PubMed ID: 16394348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer aid for decision to biopsy breast masses on mammography: validation on new cases.
Bilska-Wolak AO; Floyd CE; Lo JY; Baker JA
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):671-80. PubMed ID: 15935965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast masses: computer-aided diagnosis with serial mammograms.
Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Paramagul C; Blane C; Petrick N; Bailey J; Klein K; Foster M; Patterson SK; Adler D; Nees AV; Shen J
Radiology; 2006 Aug; 240(2):343-56. PubMed ID: 16801362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Design of a high-sensitivity classifier based on a genetic algorithm: application to computer-aided diagnosis.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM
Phys Med Biol; 1998 Oct; 43(10):2853-71. PubMed ID: 9814523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computerized classification of malignant and benign microcalcifications on mammograms: texture analysis using an artificial neural network.
Chan HP; Sahiner B; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Lam KL; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
Phys Med Biol; 1997 Mar; 42(3):549-67. PubMed ID: 9080535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Statistical textural features for detection of microcalcifications in digitized mammograms.
Kim JK; Park HW
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Mar; 18(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 10363701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image feature selection by a genetic algorithm: application to classification of mass and normal breast tissue.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Wei D; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 1996 Oct; 23(10):1671-84. PubMed ID: 8946365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Classification of mass and normal breast tissue: a convolution neural network classifier with spatial domain and texture images.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Wei D; Helvie MA; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1996; 15(5):598-610. PubMed ID: 18215941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fissures segmentation using surface features: content-based retrieval for mammographic mass using ensemble classifier.
Liu H; Lan Y; Xu X; Song E; Hung CC
Acad Radiol; 2011 Dec; 18(12):1475-84. PubMed ID: 22055794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computerized classification of benign and malignant masses on digitized mammograms: a study of robustness.
Huo Z; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ; Wolverton DE; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1077-84. PubMed ID: 11131052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of dominant features on neural network performance in the classification of mammographic lesions.
Huo Z; Giger ML; Metz CE
Phys Med Biol; 1999 Oct; 44(10):2579-95. PubMed ID: 10533930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast mass lesions: computer-aided diagnosis models with mammographic and sonographic descriptors.
Jesneck JL; Lo JY; Baker JA
Radiology; 2007 Aug; 244(2):390-8. PubMed ID: 17562812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study.
Chan HP; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Petrick N; Roubidoux MA; Wilson TE; Adler DD; Paramagul C; Newman JS; Sanjay-Gopal S
Radiology; 1999 Sep; 212(3):817-27. PubMed ID: 10478252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: automated feature analysis and classification.
Jiang Y; Nishikawa RM; Wolverton DE; Metz CE; Giger ML; Schmidt RA; Vyborny CJ; Doi K
Radiology; 1996 Mar; 198(3):671-8. PubMed ID: 8628853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computerized characterization of masses on mammograms: the rubber band straightening transform and texture analysis.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 1998 Apr; 25(4):516-26. PubMed ID: 9571620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of mammographic masses using a gradient-based segmentation algorithm and a neural classifier.
Delogu P; Evelina Fantacci M; Kasae P; Retico A
Comput Biol Med; 2007 Oct; 37(10):1479-91. PubMed ID: 17383623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A computer-aided diagnosis system for breast ultrasound based on weighted BI-RADS classes.
Rodríguez-Cristerna A; Gómez-Flores W; de Albuquerque Pereira WC
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jan; 153():33-40. PubMed ID: 29157459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computerized evaluation of mammographic lesions: what diagnostic role does the shape of the individual microcalcifications play compared with the geometry of the cluster?
Leichter I; Lederman R; Buchbinder SS; Bamberger P; Novak B; Fields S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):705-12. PubMed ID: 14975973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of performance and reproducibility of applying a content-based image retrieval scheme for classification of breast lesions.
Gundreddy RR; Tan M; Qiu Y; Cheng S; Liu H; Zheng B
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4241-9. PubMed ID: 26133622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
