These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10695708)

  • 1. Quality assessment and lipid management: considerations for computer databases for tracking patients.
    Short BC; Ballantyne CM
    Am J Cardiol; 2000 Feb; 85(3A):52A-56A. PubMed ID: 10695708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [IT systems for clinical databases--status and perspectives].
    Vingtoft S; Jensen LP; Madsen I; Nielsen PH; Kverneland A; Kjaergaard J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Sep; 164(38):4398-405. PubMed ID: 12362730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A tiered quality assurance review process for clinical data management standard operating procedures in an academic health center.
    Ittenbach RF; Baker CL; Corsmo JJ
    Acad Med; 2014 May; 89(5):745-8. PubMed ID: 24667508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of handheld computer-assisted and conventional paper chart documentation of medical records. A randomized, controlled trial.
    Stengel D; Bauwens K; Walter M; Köpfer T; Ekkernkamp A
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Mar; 86(3):553-60. PubMed ID: 14996882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient information standards development: a progress report from ASTM.
    Murphy G
    J AHIMA; 1992 Aug; 63(8):49-54. PubMed ID: 10119453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Documentation in the cardiac catheterization laboratory using electronic databases--experiences in 176 German cath labs].
    Wiesmann F; Heinrich D; Greger H; Ertl G; Voelker W
    Z Kardiol; 2003 Jul; 92(7):571-80. PubMed ID: 12883842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using computerized medical databases to measure and to improve the quality of intensive care.
    Rubenfeld GD
    J Crit Care; 2004 Dec; 19(4):248-56. PubMed ID: 15648042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structured electronic template for histopathology reports on colorectal carcinomas: a joint project by the Cancer Registry of Norway and the Norwegian Society for Pathology.
    Bjugn R; Casati B; Norstein J
    Hum Pathol; 2008 Mar; 39(3):359-67. PubMed ID: 18187180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ICOHR: intelligent computer based oral health record.
    Peterson LC; Cobb DS; Reynolds DC
    Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 2():1709. PubMed ID: 8591564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-based inpatient medical record in colorectal surgery: pilot study.
    Nissan A; Cohen AM; Graham D; FitzGerald A
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2000 Feb; 43(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 10696899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mapping the route to medication therapy management documentation and billing standardization and interoperabilility within the health care system: meeting proceedings.
    Millonig MK
    J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2009; 49(3):372-82. PubMed ID: 19357067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early experiences in using computerized patient record data for monitoring charting compliance, supporting quality initiatives and assisting with accurate charging at Allina Hospitals & Clinics.
    Collins B; Wagner M
    Int J Med Inform; 2005 Dec; 74(11-12):917-25. PubMed ID: 16169768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Development of standards for quality management in interventional cardiology].
    Brennecke R
    Herz; 1996 Oct; 21(5):304-13. PubMed ID: 9011539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The registration bog--a consequence of old-fashioned medical record-keeping].
    Morfeldt L
    Lakartidningen; 2009 Nov 4-12; 106(45):2949-50. PubMed ID: 19998814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissemination, standardization and user-flexibility in implementing TOMRs for cardiology.
    Pinciroli F; Combi C; Pozzi G; Rossi R
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1991; ():391-5. PubMed ID: 1807630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Barriers for the use of traditional clinical data].
    Neermark S; Bay-Nielsen M
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2013 Oct; 175(43):2546-9. PubMed ID: 24629149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implementation of clinical guidelines using a computer charting system. Effect on the initial care of health care workers exposed to body fluids.
    Schriger DL; Baraff LJ; Rogers WH; Cretin S
    JAMA; 1997 Nov; 278(19):1585-90. PubMed ID: 9370504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Implementation and testing of a multifunctional electronic patient record for routine practice and evaluation of patient care].
    Melchart D; Wichmann B; Polonius D; Saller R
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2001 Sep; 90(37):1587-93. PubMed ID: 11594125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spreadsheet evaluation of computerized medical records: the impact on quality, time, and money.
    Pliskin N; Glezerman M; Modai I; Weiler D
    J Med Syst; 1996 Apr; 20(2):85-100. PubMed ID: 8798951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality Dashboards: technical and architectural considerations of an actionable reporting tool for population management.
    Olsha-Yehiav M; Einbinder JS; Jung E; Linder JA; Greim J; Li Q; Schnipper JL; Middleton B
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():1052. PubMed ID: 17238671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.