118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10695874)
1. An evaluation of a new radiographic technique utilizing a concave table.
Kishigami Y; Yoshizaki A; Saito D; Seo H
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2000; 41(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 10695874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computed tomographic imaging protocol for the canine cervical and lumbar spine.
Drees R; Dennison SE; Keuler NS; Schwarz T
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2009; 50(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 19241758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transverse axial tomography of the spine.
Gargano FP
CRC Crit Rev Clin Radiol Nucl Med; 1976 Dec; 8(3):279-328. PubMed ID: 791576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Selenium-based digital radiography of the cervical spine: comparison with screen-film radiography for the depiction of anatomic details].
Ludwig K; Diederich S; Wormanns D; Link TM; Lenzen H; Heindel W
Rofo; 2002 Aug; 174(8):1028-32. PubMed ID: 12142983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimising automatic exposure control in computed radiography and the impact on patient dose.
Doyle P; Gentle D; Martin CJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):236-9. PubMed ID: 15933114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of cervical and global spine alignment under Roussouly sagittal classification in Chinese cervical spondylotic patients and asymptomatic subjects.
Yu M; Zhao WK; Li M; Wang SB; Sun Y; Jiang L; Wei F; Liu XG; Zeng L; Liu ZJ
Eur Spine J; 2015 Jun; 24(6):1265-73. PubMed ID: 25805575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lumbar spine radiography: digital flat-panel detector versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in monkeys as a pediatric model.
Ludwig K; Ahlers K; Wormanns D; Freund M; Bernhardt TM; Diederich S; Heindel W
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 12925714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [SLOT Scan imaging in teenagers with scoliosis].
Situ W; Li Y; Li Z; Hu Z; He J
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2009 Jul; 34(7):675-9. PubMed ID: 19648686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low-dose computed tomography of the lumbar spine: a phantom study on imaging parameters and image quality.
Alshamari M; Geijer M; Norrman E; Geijer H
Acta Radiol; 2014 Sep; 55(7):824-32. PubMed ID: 24215904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relative speeds of Kodak computed radiography phosphors and screen-film systems.
Huda W; Rill LN; Bruner AP
Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1621-8. PubMed ID: 9350716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of the sensitometric properties of screen-film systems and conventional dental receptors for intraoral radiography.
Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou L
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 2594331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. EFFECTS OF X-RAY BEAM ANGLE AND GEOMETRIC DISTORTION ON WIDTH OF EQUINE THORACOLUMBAR INTERSPINOUS SPACES USING RADIOGRAPHY AND COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY-A CADAVERIC STUDY.
Djernaes JD; Nielsen JV; Berg LC
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2017 Mar; 58(2):169-175. PubMed ID: 27992091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An investigation of X-ray equipment factors influencing patient dose in radiography.
Williams JR; Catling MK
Br J Radiol; 1998 Nov; 71(851):1192-8. PubMed ID: 10434915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiographic and pathologic features of spinal involvement in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH).
Resnick D; Niwayama G
Radiology; 1976 Jun; 119(3):559-68. PubMed ID: 935390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laser alignment system for high-quality portable radiography.
MacMahon H; Yasillo NJ; Carlin M
Radiographics; 1992 Jan; 12(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 1734456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the injured cervical spine: comparison of conventional and storage phosphor radiography with a hybrid cassette.
Wilson AJ; Mann FA; West OC; McEnery KW; Murphy WA
Radiology; 1994 Nov; 193(2):419-22. PubMed ID: 7972756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A urological x-ray study table with a 36-cm x-ray image intensifier].
Melchior H; Lang G
Urologe A; 1983 Jan; 22(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 6220504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose optimisation in computed radiography.
Schreiner-Karoussou A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):139-42. PubMed ID: 16461522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
