152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10696600)
1. Diagnostic accuracy of film-based, TIFF, and wavelet compressed digital temporomandibular joint images.
Trapnell CJ; Scarfe WC; Cook JH; Silvejra AM; Regennitter FJ; Haskell BS
J Digit Imaging; 2000 Feb; 13(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 10696600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital subtraction temporomandibular joint tomography.
Prapanpoch S; Langlais RP; Dove SB; Prihoda TJ; McDavid WD; Nummikoski PV; Preece JW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Jan; 75(1):122-34. PubMed ID: 8419866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new approach to improve TMJ morphological information from plain film radiographs.
Dias GJ; Premachandra IM; Mahoney PM; Kieser JA
Cranio; 2005 Jan; 23(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 15727319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of zonography, multidirectional tomography, and biplanar panoramic images for detection of simulated condylar arthropathy of the temporomandibular joint.
Tyndall DA; Davies KL; Ludlow JB
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 9082017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative and subjective analysis of temporomandibular joint radiographs.
Smith SR; Matteson SR; Phillips C; Tyndall DA
J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Oct; 62(4):456-63. PubMed ID: 2585313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Morphological analysis for kinetic X-ray images of the temporomandibular joint].
Bandai N; Sanada S; Ueki K; Funabasama S; Tsuduki S; Matsui T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Aug; 59(8):951-7. PubMed ID: 12960948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint: comparisons with panoramic radiology and linear tomography.
Honey OB; Scarfe WC; Hilgers MJ; Klueber K; Silveira AM; Haskell BS; Farman AG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):429-38. PubMed ID: 17920495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of panoramic radiography and panoramic digital subtraction radiography in the detection of simulated osteophytic lesions of the mandibular condyle.
Masood F; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 May; 93(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12075216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of TMJ by conventional transcranial radiography and indirect digitized images to determine condylar position in primary dentition.
Pereira LJ; Bonjardim LR; Castelo PM; Haiter Neto F; Gavião MB
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2004; 28(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 15163152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography and MRI for detecting signs of TMJ degenerative joint disease.
Kaimal S; Ahmad M; Kang W; Nixdorf D; Schiffman EL
Gen Dent; 2018; 66(4):34-40. PubMed ID: 29964246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of accuracy of detection of surface osseous changes in the temporomandibular joint using multidetector CT and cone beam CT.
Zain-Alabdeen EH; Alsadhan RI
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Mar; 41(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 22378752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of wavelet and discrete cosine transform compression of digital radiographs on the detection of subtle proximal caries. ROC analysis.
Schulze RK; Richter A; d'Hoedt B
Caries Res; 2008; 42(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 18701823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of lossy compression on diagnostic accuracy of radiographs for periapical lesions.
Eraso FE; Analoui M; Watson AB; Rebeschini R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 May; 93(5):621-5. PubMed ID: 12075215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is orthopantomography reliable for TMJ diagnosis? An experimental study on a dry skull.
Ruf S; Pancherz H
J Orofac Pain; 1995; 9(4):365-74. PubMed ID: 8995908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of condylar position change on digitally subtracted Orthophos P-4 and Sectograph zonogram images.
Ludlow J; Gilbert DB; Tyndall DA; Bailey L
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 9082008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Indirect digital images: limit of image compression for diagnosis in endodontics.
Siragusa M; McDonnell DJ
Int Endod J; 2002 Dec; 35(12):991-5. PubMed ID: 12653317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of film and digital tomograms for assessment of morphological changes in the TMJ.
Wiese M; Hintze H; Svensson P; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jan; 36(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 17329582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of two compression algorithms and the detection of caries.
Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; Sanderink GC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 12087443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temporomandibular joint imaging: a comparative study of diagnostic accuracy for the detection of bone change with biplanar multidirectional tomography and panoramic images.
Ludlow JB; Davies KL; Tyndall DA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Dec; 80(6):735-43. PubMed ID: 8680983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of wavelet and Joint Photographic Experts Group lossy compression methods applied to medical images.
Iyriboz TA; Zukoski MJ; Hopper KD; Stagg PL
J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):14-7. PubMed ID: 10342156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
