157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10699777)
1. Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for colonoscopy in adults.
Saifuddin T; Trivedi M; King PD; Madsen R; Marshall JB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):314-7. PubMed ID: 10699777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for routine colonoscopy in women who have undergone hysterectomy.
Marshall JB; Perez RA; Madsen RW
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Jun; 55(7):838-41. PubMed ID: 12024137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long pediatric colonoscope versus intermediate length adult colonoscope for colonoscopy.
Hsieh YH; Zhou AL; Lin HJ
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jul; 23(7 Pt 2):e7-e10. PubMed ID: 18702687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized controlled trial in a training institution comparing a pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope, a pediatric colonoscope, and an adult colonoscope.
Shumaker DA; Zaman A; Katon RM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Feb; 55(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 11818918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transparent hood attached to the colonoscope: does it really work for all types of colonoscopes?
Shida T; Katsuura Y; Teramoto O; Kaiho M; Takano S; Yoshidome H; Miyazaki M
Surg Endosc; 2008 Dec; 22(12):2654-8. PubMed ID: 18297353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrathin colonoscope with a diameter of 9.8 mm for total colonoscopy.
Okamoto M; Kawabe T; Kato J; Yamaji Y; Ikenoue T; Omata M
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2005 Sep; 39(8):679-83. PubMed ID: 16082276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective trial of variable stiffness pediatric vs. standard instrument colonoscopy.
Kaffes AJ; Mishra A; Ding SL; Hope R; Williams SJ; Gillespie PE; Bourke MJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Nov; 58(5):685-9. PubMed ID: 14595301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of bending section length on insertion and retroflexion properties of pediatric and adult colonoscopes.
Kessler WR; Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Jun; 100(6):1290-5. PubMed ID: 15929759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of a pediatric colonoscope improves the success of total colonoscopy in selected adult patients.
Marshall JB
Gastrointest Endosc; 1996 Dec; 44(6):675-8. PubMed ID: 8979056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope allows completion of colonoscopy after failure with the standard adult colonoscope.
Shumaker DA; Zaman A; Katon RM
Endoscopy; 2002 Sep; 34(9):711-4. PubMed ID: 12195328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical application of a new colonoscope with variable insertion tube rigidity: a pilot study.
Sorbi D; Schleck CD; Zinsmeister AR; Gostout CJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 May; 53(6):638-42. PubMed ID: 11323595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Usefulness of a small-caliber, variable-stiffness colonoscope as a backup in patients with difficult or incomplete colonoscopy.
Horiuchi A; Nakayama Y; Kajiyama M; Fujii H; Tanaka N
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 99(10):1936-40. PubMed ID: 15447752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients.
Rex DK
Endoscopy; 2001 Jan; 33(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 11204989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accessing proximal aspects of folds and flexures during colonoscopy: impact of a pediatric colonoscope with a short bending section.
Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Jul; 98(7):1504-7. PubMed ID: 12873570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does the use of a variable stiffness colonoscope offer advantages during colonoscopy under deep sedation? Results of a randomized trial.
Sola-Vera J; Uceda F; Brotons A; Sáez J; Girona E; Pérez E; Picó MD; Grau C; Sillero C
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Jul; 23(7):593-7. PubMed ID: 21593674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.
DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Colonoscope length and procedure efficiency.
Barthel J; Hinojosa T; Shah N
J Clin Gastroenterol; 1995 Jul; 21(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 7560830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is the variable-stiffness paediatric colonoscope more effective than a standard adult colonoscope for outpatient adult colonoscopy? A randomised controlled trial.
Al-Shurieki SH; Marshall JB
Dig Liver Dis; 2005 Sep; 37(9):698-704. PubMed ID: 15916930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Technical considerations and patient comfort in total colonoscopy with and without a transparent cap: initial experiences from a pilot study.
Dafnis GM
Endoscopy; 2000 May; 32(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 10817176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of an electromagnetic colonoscope to assess maneuvers associated with cecal intubation.
Heigh RI; DiBaise JK; Prechel JA; Horn BJ; San Miguel S; Heigh EG; Leighton JA; Edgelow CJ; Fleischer DE
BMC Gastroenterol; 2009 Apr; 9():24. PubMed ID: 19358723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]