These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10700259)
21. Comparison of shape encoding in primate dorsal and ventral visual pathways. Lehky SR; Sereno AB J Neurophysiol; 2007 Jan; 97(1):307-19. PubMed ID: 17021033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Object representations maintain attentional control settings across space and time. Schreij D; Olivers CN Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 19682674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Location and color biases have different influences on selective attention. Fecteau JH; Korjoukov I; Roelfsema PR Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(9):996-1005. PubMed ID: 19324066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. How odgcrnwi becomes crowding: stimulus-specific learning reduces crowding. Huckauf A; Nazir TA J Vis; 2007 Aug; 7(2):18.1-12. PubMed ID: 18217833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Event-related potentials in different stages of the operation of visual working memory]. Beteleva TG; Sinitsyn SV Fiziol Cheloveka; 2008; 34(3):5-15. PubMed ID: 18677942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Dynamic shifts of visual receptive fields in cortical area MT by spatial attention. Womelsdorf T; Anton-Erxleben K; Pieper F; Treue S Nat Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 9(9):1156-60. PubMed ID: 16906153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Level and mechanisms of perceptual learning: learning first-order luminance and second-order texture objects. Dosher BA; Lu ZL Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1996-2007. PubMed ID: 16414097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study. Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations. Griffin IC; Nobre AC J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Asymmetric learning transfer between imagined viewer- and object-rotations: evidence of a hierarchical organization of spatial reference frames. Pellizzer G; Bâ MB; Zanello A; Merlo MC Brain Cogn; 2009 Dec; 71(3):272-8. PubMed ID: 19748718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A different outlook on time: visual and auditory month names elicit different mental vantage points for a time-space synaesthete. Jarick M; Dixon MJ; Stewart MT; Maxwell EC; Smilek D Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1217-28. PubMed ID: 19665700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Tests enhance the transfer of learning. Rohrer D; Taylor K; Sholar B J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):233-9. PubMed ID: 20053059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Temporal dynamics of 2D and 3D shape representation in macaque visual area V4. Hegdé J; Van Essen DC Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(5):749-63. PubMed ID: 17020631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Learning transform invariant object recognition in the visual system with multiple stimuli present during training. Stringer SM; Rolls ET Neural Netw; 2008 Sep; 21(7):888-903. PubMed ID: 18440774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues. Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Not all features are created equal: Processing asymmetries between location and object features. Chen Z Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1481-91. PubMed ID: 19303423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing. He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Temporal dynamics of attentional control settings in patients with spatial neglect. Ptak R; Golay L Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 16643863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Enclosure shape influences cue competition effects and goal location learning. Wilson PN; Alexander T Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1552-67. PubMed ID: 20119881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]