BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10700737)

  • 1. Comparing diagnostic tests: a simple graphic using likelihood ratios.
    Biggerstaff BJ
    Stat Med; 2000 Mar; 19(5):649-63. PubMed ID: 10700737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a multiplex assay for the detection of antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi in horses and its validation using Bayesian and conventional statistical methods.
    Wagner B; Freer H; Rollins A; Erb HN; Lu Z; Gröhn Y
    Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2011 Dec; 144(3-4):374-81. PubMed ID: 21890217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The interpretation of test results.
    Binder M; Dreiseitl S
    J Cutan Med Surg; 2000 Jan; 4(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10689223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests - Part 2 [Pre-test and post-test probability and odds, Likelihood ratios, Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve, Youden's Index and Diagnostic test biases].
    Gogtay NJ
    J Assoc Physicians India; 2017 Jul; 65(7):86-91. PubMed ID: 28792173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic accuracy measures.
    Eusebi P
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013; 36(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 24135733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of likelihood ratios for comparisons of binary diagnostic tests: underlying ROC curves.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5821-30. PubMed ID: 21158294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when combining two diagnostic tests.
    Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L; Franco EL
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2527-46. PubMed ID: 12205697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in paired designs.
    Nofuentes JA; Del Castillo Jde D
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(22):4179-201. PubMed ID: 17357992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
    Johnson NP
    Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2257-66. PubMed ID: 15236429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The agreement chart as an alternative to the receiver-operating characteristic curve for diagnostic tests.
    Bangdiwala SI; Haedo AS; Natal ML; Villaveces A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):866-74. PubMed ID: 18687288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curve: principles and application in biology].
    Delacour H; Servonnet A; Perrot A; Vigezzi JF; Ramirez JM
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2005; 63(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 15771972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A modified ROC analysis for the selection of cut-off values and the definition of intermediate results of serodiagnostic tests.
    Greiner M; Sohr D; Göbel P
    J Immunol Methods; 1995 Sep; 185(1):123-32. PubMed ID: 7665894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The diagnostic utility of multiple-level likelihood ratios.
    Bowden SC; Loring DW
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Sep; 15(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 19635177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Slopes of a receiver operating characteristic curve and likelihood ratios for a diagnostic test.
    Choi BC
    Am J Epidemiol; 1998 Dec; 148(11):1127-32. PubMed ID: 9850136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Youden's index and the weight of evidence.
    Hughes G
    Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(2):198-9. PubMed ID: 25658987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A readers' guide to the interpretation of diagnostic test properties: clinical example of sepsis.
    Fischer JE; Bachmann LM; Jaeschke R
    Intensive Care Med; 2003 Jul; 29(7):1043-51. PubMed ID: 12734652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The diagnostic accuracy of serological tests for Lyme borreliosis in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Leeflang MM; Ang CW; Berkhout J; Bijlmer HA; Van Bortel W; Brandenburg AH; Van Burgel ND; Van Dam AP; Dessau RB; Fingerle V; Hovius JW; Jaulhac B; Meijer B; Van Pelt W; Schellekens JF; Spijker R; Stelma FF; Stanek G; Verduyn-Lunel F; Zeller H; Sprong H
    BMC Infect Dis; 2016 Mar; 16():140. PubMed ID: 27013465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence-based emergency medicine/skills for evidence-based emergency care. Interval likelihood ratios: another advantage for the evidence-based diagnostician.
    Brown MD; Reeves MJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Aug; 42(2):292-7. PubMed ID: 12883521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests for Lyme Disease in Humans, A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of North American Research.
    Waddell LA; Greig J; Mascarenhas M; Harding S; Lindsay R; Ogden N
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0168613. PubMed ID: 28002488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.