These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Out-of-hospital defibrillation with automated external defibrillators: postshock analysis should be delayed. Blouin D; Topping C; Moore S; Stiell I; Afilalo M Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Sep; 38(3):256-61. PubMed ID: 11524644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Basic life support and emergency cardiovascular care guidelines, Part 2: Defibrillators. Ryan WA Dent Today; 2001 Oct; 20(10):103-7. PubMed ID: 11665404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance and error analysis of automated external defibrillator use in the out-of-hospital setting. Macdonald RD; Swanson JM; Mottley JL; Weinstein C Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Sep; 38(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 11524645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A shock at home can save a life. For some people, it makes sense to have an automated external defibrillator at home. Harv Heart Lett; 2003 Jan; 13(5):6-7. PubMed ID: 12543613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Pediatric defibrillation doses often fail to terminate prolonged out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation in children. Berg MD; Samson RA; Meyer RJ; Clark LL; Valenzuela TD; Berg RA Resuscitation; 2005 Oct; 67(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 16199288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated external defibrillators: to what extent does the algorithm delay CPR? Rea TD; Shah S; Kudenchuk PJ; Copass MK; Cobb LA Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Aug; 46(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 16046942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council 2000 for automatic external defibrillation. Position of the Basic Life Support and Automated External Defibrillation Working Group, following dismissal by the Executive Committee of the European Resuscitation Council]. Arntz HR; Z Kardiol; 2002 Sep; 91(9):673-6. PubMed ID: 12448065 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimal interruption of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for a single shock as mandated by automated external defibrillations does not compromise outcomes in a porcine model of cardiac arrest and resuscitation. Ristagno G; Tang W; Russell JK; Jorgenson D; Wang H; Sun S; Weil MH Crit Care Med; 2008 Nov; 36(11):3048-53. PubMed ID: 18824916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Significance of initial defibrillation by paramedics]. Mauer D; Schneider T; Dick W Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1995 Aug; 30(5):303-6. PubMed ID: 7548483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. To shock or not to shock: that is the question. White RD Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Sep; 38(3):278-81. PubMed ID: 11524647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Transthoracic incremental monophasic versus biphasic defibrillation by emergency responders (TIMBER): a randomized comparison of monophasic with biphasic waveform ascending energy defibrillation for the resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation. Kudenchuk PJ; Cobb LA; Copass MK; Olsufka M; Maynard C; Nichol G Circulation; 2006 Nov; 114(19):2010-8. PubMed ID: 17060379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The need for separate analyses of survival for "in-home" arrests versus "out-of-home" arrests in the determination of whether it is best to shock first or perform 3 min of CPR before the first defibrillation; in patients with ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest when the ambulance response time is greater than 5 min. Rottenberg EM Resuscitation; 2009 Apr; 80(4):498-9. PubMed ID: 19185410 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reducing no flow times during automated external defibrillation. Eilevstjønn J; Kramer-Johansen J; Eftestøl T; Stavland M; Myklebust H; Steen PA Resuscitation; 2005 Oct; 67(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 16154679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]