226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10701518)
1. The measurement of proton stopping power using proton-cone-beam computed tomography.
Zygmanski P; Gall KP; Rabin MS; Rosenthal SJ
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Feb; 45(2):511-28. PubMed ID: 10701518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved proton computed tomography by dual modality image reconstruction.
Hansen DC; Petersen JB; Bassler N; Sørensen TS
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031904. PubMed ID: 24593722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy.
Jaffray DA; Siewerdsen JH; Wong JW; Martinez AA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Aug; 53(5):1337-49. PubMed ID: 12128137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of beam purity and scanner complexity on proton CT accuracy.
Piersimoni P; Ramos-Méndez J; Geoghegan T; Bashkirov VA; Schulte RW; Faddegon BA
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):284-298. PubMed ID: 28066887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accurate technique for complete geometric calibration of cone-beam computed tomography systems.
Cho Y; Moseley DJ; Siewerdsen JH; Jaffray DA
Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):968-83. PubMed ID: 15895580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A maximum likelihood method for high resolution proton radiography/proton CT.
Collins-Fekete CA; Brousmiche S; Portillo SK; Beaulieu L; Seco J
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Dec; 61(23):8232-8248. PubMed ID: 27811399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric comparison of stopping power calibration with dual-energy CT and single-energy CT in proton therapy treatment planning.
Zhu J; Penfold SN
Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2845-2854. PubMed ID: 27277033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flat panel detector-based cone beam computed tomography with a circle-plus-two-arcs data acquisition orbit: preliminary phantom study.
Ning R; Tang X; Conover D; Yu R
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1694-705. PubMed ID: 12906186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of CT image noise on proton range calculation in radiotherapy planning.
Chvetsov AV; Paige SL
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(6):N141-9. PubMed ID: 20182006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A particle track-repeating algorithm for proton beam dose calculation.
Li JS; Shahine B; Fourkal E; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):1001-10. PubMed ID: 15798272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An experimental demonstration of a new type of proton computed tomography using a novel silicon tracking detector.
Taylor JT; Poludniowski G; Price T; Waltham C; Allport PP; Casse GL; Esposito M; Evans PM; Green S; Manger S; Manolopoulos S; Nieto-Camero J; Parker DJ; Symons J; Allinson NM
Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 43(11):6129. PubMed ID: 27806609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image-guided radiotherapy using a mobile kilovoltage x-ray device.
Sorensen SP; Chow PE; Kriminski S; Medin PM; Solberg TD
Med Dosim; 2006; 31(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 16551528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient-specific stopping power calibration for proton therapy planning based on single-detector proton radiography.
Doolan PJ; Testa M; Sharp G; Bentefour EH; Royle G; Lu HM
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Mar; 60(5):1901-17. PubMed ID: 25668437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A simulation study on proton computed tomography (CT) stopping power accuracy using dual energy CT scans as benchmark.
Hansen DC; Seco J; Sørensen TS; Petersen JB; Wildberger JE; Verhaegen F; Landry G
Acta Oncol; 2015; 54(9):1638-42. PubMed ID: 26219959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Scattering proton CT.
Krah N; Quiñones CT; Létang JM; Rit S
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(22):225015. PubMed ID: 32998114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Commissioning an in-room mobile CT for adaptive proton therapy with a compact proton system.
Oliver JA; Zeidan O; Meeks SL; Shah AP; Pukala J; Kelly P; Ramakrishna NR; Willoughby TR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):149-158. PubMed ID: 29682879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Helium CT: Monte Carlo simulation results for an ideal source and detector with comparison to proton CT.
Piersimoni P; Faddegon BA; Méndez JR; Schulte RW; Volz L; Seco J
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3264-3274. PubMed ID: 29727481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A more accurate reconstruction system matrix for quantitative proton computed tomography.
Penfold SN; Rosenfeld AB; Schulte RW; Schubert KE
Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4511-8. PubMed ID: 19928082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sparse-view proton computed tomography using modulated proton beams.
Lee J; Kim C; Min B; Kwak J; Park S; Lee SB; Park S; Cho S
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):1129-37. PubMed ID: 25652524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simulated scatter performance of an inverse-geometry dedicated breast CT system.
Bhagtani R; Schmidt TG
Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):788-96. PubMed ID: 19378739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
