151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10701619)
1. Efficacy of step-oblique mammography for confirmation and localization of densities seen on only one standard mammographic view.
Pearson KL; Sickles EA; Frankel SD; Leung JW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Mar; 174(3):745-52. PubMed ID: 10701619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Findings at mammographic screening on only one standard projection: outcomes analysis.
Sickles EA
Radiology; 1998 Aug; 208(2):471-5. PubMed ID: 9680578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of False-Positive Versus True-Positive Findings on Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.
Amir T; Hogan MP; Jacobs S; Sevilimedu V; Sung J; Jochelson MS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 May; 218(5):797-808. PubMed ID: 34817195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast tomosynthesis for the clarification of mammographic BI-RADS 3 lesions can decrease follow-up examinations and enables immediate cancer diagnosis.
Bahrs SD; Otto V; Hattermann V; Klumpp B; Hahn M; Nikolaou K; Siegmann-Luz K
Acta Radiol; 2018 Oct; 59(10):1176-1183. PubMed ID: 29451022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Posterior breast cancer - mammographic and ultrasonographic features.
Janković A; Nadrljanski M; Karapandzić VP; Ivanović N; Radojicić Z; Milosević Z
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2013 Nov; 70(11):1034-8. PubMed ID: 24397199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitivity of a direct computer-aided detection system in full-field digital mammography for detection of microcalcifications not associated with mass or architectural distortion.
Scaranelo AM; Crystal P; Bukhanov K; Helbich TH
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2010 Jun; 61(3):162-9. PubMed ID: 20137883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 17114620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Asymmetric mammographic findings based on the fourth edition of BI-RADS: types, evaluation, and management.
Youk JH; Kim EK; Ko KH; Kim MJ
Radiographics; 2009; 29(1):e33. PubMed ID: 19036720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Additional images and subsequent palpation--indispensable conditions for efficient diagnosis using mammography].
Hüppe JR
Z Lymphol; 1986 Dec; 10(2):63-76. PubMed ID: 3825243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Focal asymmetric densities seen at mammography: US and pathologic correlation.
Samardar P; de Paredes ES; Grimes MM; Wilson JD
Radiographics; 2002; 22(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 11796895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast radiography using the oblique projection.
Bassett LW; Gold RH
Radiology; 1983 Nov; 149(2):585-7. PubMed ID: 6622708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammography for screening high-risk patients for cancer: value of including a lateral projection.
Kreager JA; Kornguth PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):295-7. PubMed ID: 8310913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An investigation into why two-view mammography is better than one-view in breast cancer screening.
Hackshaw AK; Wald NJ; Michell MJ; Field S; Wilson AR
Clin Radiol; 2000 Jun; 55(6):454-8. PubMed ID: 10873691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Selective use of the oblique projection in mammography.
Hall FM; Berenberg AL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Sep; 131(3):465-8. PubMed ID: 98991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for intramammary cancer staging: preliminary results.
Blum KS; Rubbert C; Mathys B; Antoch G; Mohrmann S; Obenauer S
Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1363-9. PubMed ID: 25127846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Second-screening mammography: one versus two views per breast.
Ikeda DM; Sickles EA
Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):651-6. PubMed ID: 3406393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Impact of mammographic breast density on computer-assisted detection (CAD) in a breast imaging department].
Romero Castellano C; Varela Nuñez C; Cuena Boy R; Almenar Gil A; Pinto Varela JM; Botella Lopez M
Radiologia; 2011; 53(5):456-61. PubMed ID: 21641624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy.
Orel SG; Kay N; Reynolds C; Sullivan DC
Radiology; 1999 Jun; 211(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 10352614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Malignant lesions initially subjected to short-term mammographic follow-up.
Rosen EL; Baker JA; Soo MS
Radiology; 2002 Apr; 223(1):221-8. PubMed ID: 11930070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
