These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10702333)

  • 21. Chamber evaluation of a personal, bioaerosol cyclone sampler.
    Macher J; Chen B; Rao C
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Nov; 5(11):702-12. PubMed ID: 18720289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Environment surveillance of filamentous fungi in two tertiary care hospitals in China.
    Hao ZF; Ao JH; Hao F; Yang RY; Zhu H; Zhang J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Jul; 124(13):1970-5. PubMed ID: 22088455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment and predictors determination of indoor airborne fungal concentrations in Paris newborn babies' homes.
    Dassonville C; Demattei C; Detaint B; Barral S; Bex-Capelle V; Momas I
    Environ Res; 2008 Sep; 108(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 18571639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Exposure to culturable airborne bioaerosols during noodle manufacturing in central Taiwan.
    Tsai MY; Liu HM
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Feb; 407(5):1536-46. PubMed ID: 19062076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Viable fungi and bacteria in personal exposure samples in relation to microenvironments.
    Toivola M; Alm S; Nevalainen A
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Feb; 6(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 14760454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Volumetric assessment of airborne fungi in two sections of a rural indoor dairy cattle shed.
    Adhikari A; Sen MM; Gupta-Bhattacharya S; Chanda S
    Environ Int; 2004 Feb; 29(8):1071-8. PubMed ID: 14680890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation and a predictive model of airborne fungal concentrations in school classrooms.
    Bartlett KH; Kennedy SM; Brauer M; Van Netten C; Dill B
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Aug; 48(6):547-54. PubMed ID: 15302620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Resolution of sick building syndrome in a high-security facility.
    Hiipakka DW; Buffington JR
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2000 Aug; 15(8):635-43. PubMed ID: 10957819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Total airborne mold particle sampling: evaluation of sample collection, preparation and counting procedures, and collection devices.
    Godish D; Godish T
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Feb; 5(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 18085480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A pilot investigation into associations between indoor airborne fungal and non-biological particle concentrations in residential houses in Brisbane, Australia.
    Hargreaves M; Parappukkaran S; Morawska L; Hitchins J; He C; Gilbert D
    Sci Total Environ; 2003 Aug; 312(1-3):89-101. PubMed ID: 12873402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bioaerosol emissions from a suburban yard waste composting facility.
    Hryhorczuk D; Curtis L; Scheff P; Chung J; Rizzo M; Lewis C; Keys N; Moomey M
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2001; 8(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 11748875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Indoor and outdoor bioaerosol levels at recreation facilities, elementary schools, and homes.
    Jo WK; Seo YJ
    Chemosphere; 2005 Dec; 61(11):1570-9. PubMed ID: 15982704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Exposure to airborne fungi during conservative dental treatment.
    Szymańska J
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2006; 13(1):177-9. PubMed ID: 16841889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of sampling duration on recovery of culturable fungi using the Andersen N6 and RCS bioaerosol samplers.
    Saldanha R; Manno M; Saleh M; Ewaze JO; Scott JA
    Indoor Air; 2008 Dec; 18(6):464-72. PubMed ID: 18761682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Aeromycological study at the intensive care unit of the "Dr. Manuel Gea Gonzalez" General Hospital.
    Ríos-Yuil JM; Arenas R; Fernández R; Calderón-Ezquerro M; Rodriguez-Badillo R
    Braz J Infect Dis; 2012; 16(5):432-5. PubMed ID: 22975170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of several media types and basic techniques used to assess outdoor airborne fungi in Melbourne, Australia.
    Black WD
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0238901. PubMed ID: 33338037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A year-round aeromycological study in Zagreb area, Croatia.
    Segvić Klarić M; Pepeljnjak S
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2006; 13(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 16841873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Exposure to airborne microorganisms and endotoxin in herb processing plants.
    Dutkiewicz J; Krysińska-Traczyk E; Skórska C; Sitkowska J; Prazmo Z; Golec M
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2001; 8(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 11748878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Biological hazards in air at municipal waste landfills].
    Buczyńska A; Cyprowski M; Szadkowska-Stańczyk I
    Med Pr; 2006; 57(6):531-5. PubMed ID: 17533990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Enumeration and identification of airborne viable mould propagules in houses. A field comparison of selected techniques.
    Verhoeff AP; van Wijnen JH; Boleij JS; Brunekreef B; van Reenen-Hoekstra ES; Samson RA
    Allergy; 1990 May; 45(4):275-84. PubMed ID: 2382792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.