These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10704548)

  • 1. Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice.
    Burnstein Y; Ellish NJ; Magbalon M; Higginbotham EJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):328-33. PubMed ID: 10704548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, and Humphrey Swedish interactive threshold algorithm-fast perimetry in a glaucoma practice.
    Wadood AC; Azuara-Blanco A; Aspinall P; Taguri A; King AJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Mar; 133(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 11860968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology.
    Quigley HA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jun; 125(6):819-29. PubMed ID: 9645719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Cello KE; Nelson-Quigg JM; Johnson CA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):314-22. PubMed ID: 10704546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency-doubling threshold perimetry in predicting glaucoma in a population-based study: The Beijing Eye Study.
    Wang YX; Xu L; Zhang RX; Jonas JB
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 125(10):1402-6. PubMed ID: 17923550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix.
    Matsumoto C; Takada S; Okuyama S; Arimura E; Hashimoto S; Shimomura Y
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 16637839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Algorithm for interpreting the results of frequency doubling perimetry.
    Patel SC; Friedman DS; Varadkar P; Robin AL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):323-7. PubMed ID: 10704547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
    Sample PA; Medeiros FA; Racette L; Pascual JP; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequency doubling technology for earlier detection of functional damage in standard automated perimetry-normal hemifield in glaucoma with low-to-normal pressure.
    Nakagawa S; Murata H; Saito H; Nakahara H; Mataki N; Tomidokoro A; Iwase A; Araie M
    J Glaucoma; 2012 Jan; 21(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 21543995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interpretation of the Humphrey Matrix 24-2 test in the diagnosis of preperimetric glaucoma.
    Choi JA; Lee NY; Park CK
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 53(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 19184305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
    Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
    J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detecting visual function abnormalities using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and matrix perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc.
    Sakata LM; Deleon-Ortega J; Arthur SN; Monheit BE; Girkin CA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 125(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 17353404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of long-term variability for standard and short-wavelength automated perimetry in stable glaucoma patients.
    Blumenthal EZ; Sample PA; Zangwill L; Lee AC; Kono Y; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 10704545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early glaucoma detection using the Humphrey Matrix Perimeter, GDx VCC, Stratus OCT, and retinal nerve fiber layer photography.
    Hong S; Ahn H; Ha SJ; Yeom HY; Seong GJ; Hong YJ
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Feb; 114(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 17270671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, SITA Standard and SITA Fast perimetry in perimetrically inexperienced individuals.
    Pierre-Filho Pde T; Schimiti RB; de Vasconcellos JP; Costa VP
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16704696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Value of 10-2 Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma Patients with Early 24-2 Visual Field Loss.
    West ME; Sharpe GP; Hutchison DM; Rafuse PE; Shuba LM; Nicolela MT; Vianna JR; Chauhan BC
    Ophthalmology; 2021 Apr; 128(4):545-553. PubMed ID: 32898515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening for glaucoma with frequency-doubling technology and Damato campimetry.
    Yamada N; Chen PP; Mills RP; Leen MM; Lieberman MF; Stamper RL; Stanford DC
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1999 Nov; 117(11):1479-84. PubMed ID: 10565516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of frequency doubling perimetry in detecting neuro-ophthalmic visual field defects.
    Thomas D; Thomas R; Muliyil JP; George R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 131(6):734-41. PubMed ID: 11384569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.