These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10704548)

  • 41. Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry.
    Hood DC; Thienprasiddhi P; Greenstein VC; Winn BJ; Ohri N; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Feb; 45(2):492-8. PubMed ID: 14744890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry as a Means of Screening for Glaucoma and Other Eye Diseases Using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
    Boland MV; Gupta P; Ko F; Zhao D; Guallar E; Friedman DS
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2016 Jan; 134(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 26562502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Discriminating ability of Humphrey matrix perimetry in early glaucoma patients.
    Hong S; Chung W; Hong YJ; Seong GJ
    Ophthalmologica; 2007; 221(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 17440283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Alward WL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):376-8. PubMed ID: 10755955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice.
    Brusini P
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 130(6):859-60. PubMed ID: 11192559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
    Boden C; Pascual J; Medeiros FA; Aihara M; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Automated perimetry detects visual field loss before manual Goldmann perimetry.
    Katz J; Tielsch JM; Quigley HA; Sommer A
    Ophthalmology; 1995 Jan; 102(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 7831036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A new visual field test in empty sella syndrome: rarebit perimetry.
    Yavas GF; Küsbeci T; Eser O; Ermis SS; Coşar M; Oztürk F
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2008; 18(4):628-32. PubMed ID: 18609487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss.
    Goldberg I; Graham SL; Klistorner AI
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Jan; 133(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11755837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluating a visual field screening test for glaucoma: how the choice of the gold standard affects the validity of the test.
    Ellish NJ; Higginbotham EJ
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 8(5):297-307. PubMed ID: 11922383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry.
    Johnson CA; Samuels SJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):413-25. PubMed ID: 9040475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Population and high-risk group screening for glaucoma: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study.
    Francis BA; Varma R; Vigen C; Lai MY; Winarko J; Nguyen B; Azen S;
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 52(9):6257-64. PubMed ID: 21245400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Glaucoma detection with frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength perimetry.
    Horn FK; Brenning A; Jünemann AG; Lausen B
    J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):363-71. PubMed ID: 17570999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Suprathreshold static perimetry in glaucoma and other optic nerve disease.
    Johnson CA; Keltner JL; Balestrery FG
    Ophthalmology; 1979 Jul; 86(7):1278-86. PubMed ID: 233860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Potential of stratus optical coherence tomography for detecting early glaucoma in perimetrically normal eyes of open-angle glaucoma patients with unilateral visual field loss.
    Zhang Y; Wu LL; Yang YF
    J Glaucoma; 2010 Jan; 19(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 20075675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Scanning laser polarimetry using variable corneal compensation in the detection of glaucoma with localized visual field defects.
    Kook MS; Cho HS; Seong M; Choi J
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1970-8. PubMed ID: 16185765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Topographic relationship between frequency-doubling technology threshold values.
    Fuertes-Lazaro I; Sanchez-Cano A; Ferreras A; Larrosa JM; Garcia-Martin E; Pablo LE
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 90(2):e144-50. PubMed ID: 22103468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Humphrey Matrix perimetry in optic nerve and chiasmal disorders: comparison with Humphrey SITA standard 24-2.
    Huang CQ; Carolan J; Redline D; Taravati P; Woodward KR; Johnson CA; Wall M; Keltner JL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 18326712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of an algorithm for detecting visual field defects due to chiasmal and postchiasmal lesions: the neurological hemifield test.
    Boland MV; McCoy AN; Quigley HA; Miller NR; Subramanian PS; Ramulu PY; Murakami P; Danesh-Meyer HV
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Oct; 52(11):7959-65. PubMed ID: 21896843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.