105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10706250)
1. Med school to relax rules on business links?
Nadis S
Nature; 2000 Feb; 403(6772):818. PubMed ID: 10706250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Conflict-of-interest policies.
Ratain MJ; Sheridan ME
N Engl J Med; 2001 Mar; 344(13):1018. PubMed ID: 11280317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical-research ethics under the microscope: schools try to plot the fine line between commercial links and conflicts of interest.
Mangan KS
Chron High Educ; 2003 Jul; 49(46):A22-4. PubMed ID: 15287130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical schools adopt new research rules.
Mangan KS
Chron High Educ; 2004 Sep; 51(5):A28. PubMed ID: 15540372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Conflict-of-interest policies.
Nurok M
N Engl J Med; 2001 Mar; 344(13):1017; author reply 1018. PubMed ID: 11280316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Conflict-of-interest policy. NIH rules make some pack, others plead.
Kaiser J
Science; 2005 Mar; 307(5716):1703. PubMed ID: 15774729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical schools tackle conflict of interest.
Catton M
CMAJ; 2005 Nov; 173(10):1143. PubMed ID: 16275958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Conflict of interest. Scientists, societies blast NIH ethics rules.
Kaiser J
Science; 2005 Apr; 308(5719):175-7. PubMed ID: 15821050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Truth is no longer its own reward.
Kiernan V
New Sci; 1997 Mar; 153(2071):11. PubMed ID: 11656626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Washington University School of Medicine.
Office of Medical Public Affairs
Acad Med; 2006 May; 81(5):431. PubMed ID: 16639195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Making friends with the campus capitalists.
Wingerson L
New Sci; 1982 Dec 23-30; 96(1337-1338):780. PubMed ID: 11655527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Financial conflicts of interest in human subjects research: proposals for a more effective regulatory scheme.
Jordan KA
Wash Lee Law Rev; 2003; 60(1):15-109. PubMed ID: 16273696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Conflicts of interest. NIH scientists raise fuss about scope of new rules.
Kaiser J
Science; 2005 Mar; 307(5714):1390. PubMed ID: 15746396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Perspectives. Stock ownership: sullying research purity?
Moskowitz DB
Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1993 Feb; 47(6):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10123499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Stealth merger: drug companies and government medical research.
Willman D
Los Angeles Times; 2003 Dec; ():A1, A32-3. PubMed ID: 14971391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Gaps in adopting conflicts of interest policies among u.s. Medical schools.
Lang L
Gastroenterology; 2008 Apr; 134(4):905-6. PubMed ID: 18395066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The appropriate limits of science in the formation of public policy.
Condic ML; Condic SB
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 2003; 17(1):157-79. PubMed ID: 14986651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. NIH conflicts rules are not right for universities.
Korn D; Ehringhaus SH
Nature; 2005 Apr; 434(7035):821. PubMed ID: 15829935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Fear of influence: conflict of interest in biomedical and genetic research.
Shamoo AE; Cole JW
Genewatch; 2004; 17(4):12-3. PubMed ID: 15460599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Value rules: senior management incentives in the post-option era.
Ericson R
Benefits Q; 2004; 20(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 15015422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
