155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10707399)
1. Transperitoneal laparoscopic exposure for lumbar interbody fusion.
Lieberman IH; Willsher PC; Litwin DE; Salo PT; Kraetschmer BG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Feb; 25(4):509-14; discussion 515. PubMed ID: 10707399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic approach to L4-L5 for interbody fusion using BAK cages: experience in the first 58 cases.
Regan JJ; Aronoff RJ; Ohnmeiss DD; Sengupta DK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Oct; 24(20):2171-4. PubMed ID: 10543017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective comparison of surgical approach for anterior L4-L5 fusion: laparoscopic versus mini anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Zdeblick TA; David SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Oct; 25(20):2682-7. PubMed ID: 11034657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic fusion of the lumbar spine: minimally invasive spine surgery. A prospective multicenter study evaluating open and laparoscopic lumbar fusion.
Regan JJ; Yuan H; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(4):402-11. PubMed ID: 10065526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Oblique Anterolateral Approach to the Lumbar Spine Provides Access to the Lumbar Spine With Few Early Complications.
Mehren C; Mayer HM; Zandanell C; Siepe CJ; Korge A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Sep; 474(9):2020-7. PubMed ID: 27160744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Video-assisted versus open anterior lumbar spine fusion surgery: a comparison of four techniques and complications in 135 patients.
Escobar E; Transfeldt E; Garvey T; Ogilvie J; Graber J; Schultz L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(7):729-32. PubMed ID: 12671364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic approaches to the lumbar vertebrae. An anatomic study using a porcine model.
Southerland SR; Remedios AM; McKerrell JG; Litwin D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Jul; 20(14):1620-3. PubMed ID: 7570178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal exposure.
Sasso RC; Kenneth Burkus J; LeHuec JC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 May; 28(10):1023-6. PubMed ID: 12768143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2 with cylindrical interbody cages.
Haid RW; Branch CL; Alexander JT; Burkus JK
Spine J; 2004; 4(5):527-38; discussion 538-9. PubMed ID: 15363423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic discectomy with anterior lumbar interbody fusion. A preliminary review.
Mathews HH; Evans MT; Molligan HJ; Long BH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Aug; 20(16):1797-802. PubMed ID: 7502137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new extensile anterolateral retroperitoneal approach for lumbar interbody fusion from L1 to S1: a prospective series with clinical outcomes.
Molloy S; Butler JS; Benton A; Malhotra K; Selvadurai S; Agu O
Spine J; 2016 Jun; 16(6):786-91. PubMed ID: 27033312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective study of laparoscopic spinal fusion. Technique and operative complications.
Mahvi DM; Zdeblick TA
Ann Surg; 1996 Jul; 224(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 8678623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The da Vinci robotic surgical assisted anterior lumbar interbody fusion: technical development and case report.
Beutler WJ; Peppelman WC; DiMarco LA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 22842558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Mayer HM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Mar; 22(6):691-9; discussion 700. PubMed ID: 9089943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of insufflation vs. retractional technique for laparoscopic-assisted intervertebral fusion of the lumbar spine.
Hannon JK; Faircloth WB; Lane DR; Ronderos JF; Snow LL; Weinstein LS; West JL
Surg Endosc; 2000 Mar; 14(3):300-4. PubMed ID: 10741454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An open, minimally invasive approach to the lumbar spine.
Dewald CJ; Millikan KW; Hammerberg KW; Doolas A; Dewald RL
Am Surg; 1999 Jan; 65(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 9915535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases.
Rodgers WB; Gerber EJ; Patterson J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jan; 36(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 21192221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Revision strategies for salvaging or improving failed cylindrical cages.
McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Lee GA; Orbegoso CM; Haggerty CJ; Fedder IL; Griffith SL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Oct; 24(20):2147-53. PubMed ID: 10543014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is laparoscopic approach to lumbar spine fusion worthwhile?
Katkhouda N; Campos GM; Mavor E; Mason RJ; Hume M; Ting A
Am J Surg; 1999 Dec; 178(6):458-61. PubMed ID: 10670852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Kepler CK; Yu AL; Gruskay JA; Delasotta LA; Radcliff KE; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Vaccaro AR
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 23218509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
