BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10708069)

  • 21. Binaural loudness summation in the hearing impaired.
    Hawkins DB; Prosek RA; Walden BE; Montgomery AA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Mar; 30(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 3560897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Monaural and binaural loudness of 5- and 200-ms tones in normal and impaired hearing.
    Whilby S; Florentine M; Wagner E; Marozeau J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jun; 119(6):3931-9. PubMed ID: 16838536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Relationship Between Intensity Coding and Binaural Sensitivity in Adults With Cochlear Implants.
    Todd AE; Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):e128-e141. PubMed ID: 27787393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Potential Consequences of Spectral and Binaural Loudness Summation for Bilateral Hearing Aid Fitting.
    van Beurden M; Boymans M; van Geleuken M; Oetting D; Kollmeier B; Dreschler WA
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518805690. PubMed ID: 30353784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Spoken word recognition development in children with residual hearing using cochlear implants and hearing AIDS in opposite ears.
    Holt RF; Kirk KI; Eisenberg LS; Martinez AS; Campbell W
    Ear Hear; 2005 Aug; 26(4 Suppl):82S-91S. PubMed ID: 16082270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Toward an Individual Binaural Loudness Model for Hearing Aid Fitting and Development.
    Pieper I; Mauermann M; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():634943. PubMed ID: 34239474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Binaural directivity patterns for normal and aided human hearing.
    Sivonen VP
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):674-7. PubMed ID: 21552128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modulation frequency discrimination with single and multiple channels in cochlear implant users.
    Galvin JJ; Oba S; Başkent D; Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():7-18. PubMed ID: 25746914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of reference interaural time and intensity differences on binaural performance in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Koehnke J; Culotta CP; Hawley ML; Colburn HS
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):331-53. PubMed ID: 8549890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Contralateral Interference Caused by Binaurally Presented Competing Speech in Adult Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Goupell MJ; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):110-123. PubMed ID: 28787316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessing binaural/bimodal advantages using auditory event-related potentials in subjects with cochlear implants.
    Sasaki T; Yamamoto K; Iwaki T; Kubo T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Oct; 36(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 19297109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
    Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing.
    Boëx C; Baud L; Cosendai G; Sigrist A; Kós MI; Pelizzone M
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 7(2):110-24. PubMed ID: 16450213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Diotic loudness summation in normal and impaired hearing.
    Hall JW; Harvey AD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):445-8. PubMed ID: 4046585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Electrical middle ear muscle reflex: use in cochlear implant programming.
    Hodges AV; Balkany TJ; Ruth RA; Lambert PR; Dolan-Ash S; Schloffman JJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Sep; 117(3 Pt 1):255-61. PubMed ID: 9334774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Psychophysics, fitting, and signal processing for combined hearing aid and cochlear implant stimulation.
    Francart T; McDermott HJ
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):685-700. PubMed ID: 24165299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Music Is More Enjoyable With Two Ears, Even If One of Them Receives a Degraded Signal Provided By a Cochlear Implant.
    Landsberger DM; Vermeire K; Stupak N; Lavender A; Neukam J; Van de Heyning P; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):476-490. PubMed ID: 31469701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.