BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10708074)

  • 21. Comparison of real-ear to coupler difference values in the right and left ear of hearing aid users.
    Munro KJ; Howlin EM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):146-50. PubMed ID: 19745743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A probe earmold system for measuring eardrum SPL under hearing-aid conditions.
    Gilman S; Dirks DD
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 6719011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Validation of an integrated pressure level measured earmold wideband real-ear-to-coupler difference measurement.
    Urichuk M; Purcell D; Allen P; Scollie S
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Sep; ():1-9. PubMed ID: 37722804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference: Physical and Perceptual Differences.
    Jorgensen L; Barrett R; Jedlicka D; Messersmith J; Pratt S
    Am J Audiol; 2022 Dec; 31(4):1088-1097. PubMed ID: 36037483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Filter effect of earmold venting: comparison of electroacoustic and psychoacoustic methods of evaluation.
    Franks JR; Cooper WA; McFall RN
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 3(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 893203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predicting children's real-ear-to-coupler differences based on tympanometric data.
    McCreery RW; Crukley J; Grindle A; Merchant GR; Walker E
    Int J Audiol; 2023 May; 62(5):462-471. PubMed ID: 36752672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of vent effects between a solid earmold and a hollow earmold.
    Kuk F; Keenan D; Lau CC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Sep; 20(8):480-91. PubMed ID: 19764168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of predicted ear canal speech levels using the VIOLA input/output-based fitting strategy.
    Cox RM; Flamme GA
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 9562536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Applying the reference values of real-ear-to-coupler-difference for deaf and hard-of-hearing children in Taiwan: Cautions and considerations.
    Lin CY; Chang YP; Ma YJ
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0295236. PubMed ID: 38039315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predicting wideband real-ear-to-coupler differences in children using wideband acoustic immittance.
    McCreery RW; Grindle A; Merchant GR; Crukley J; Walker EA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Aug; 154(2):991-1002. PubMed ID: 37581511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparisons among SPLs in real ears, 2 cm3 and 6 cm3 couplers.
    Hawkins DB; Cooper WA; Thompson DJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1990 Jul; 1(3):154-61. PubMed ID: 2132599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Real-Ear to coupler difference in patients with ear drum perforation.
    Liu TC; Lin KN
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1999; 61(6):345-9. PubMed ID: 10545809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Maximum usable real-ear insertion gain with ten earmold designs.
    Kuk FK
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Jan; 5(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 8155894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact on hearing aid targets of measuring thresholds in dB HL versus dB SPL.
    Saunders GH; Morgan DE
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Sep; 42(6):319-26. PubMed ID: 14570239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Feasibility of High-Resolution Computed Tomography Imaging for Obtaining Ear Impressions for Hearing Aid Fitting.
    Chen CK; Hsieh LC; Chiang YC; Cheng WD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Oct; 161(4):666-671. PubMed ID: 31060451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Signal delivery/real ear measurement system for hearing aid selection and fitting.
    Zelisko DL; Seewald RC; Gagné JP
    Ear Hear; 1992 Dec; 13(6):460-3. PubMed ID: 1342584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Longitudinal changes in real-ear to coupler difference measurements in infants.
    Bingham K; Jenstad LM; Shahnaz N
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Oct; 20(9):558-68. PubMed ID: 19902703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hearing aid microphone location effects on speech discrimination in noise.
    Franks JR; Feth LL; Daniloff RG
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(6):241-50. PubMed ID: 7308598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of a probe-tube insertion technique for measuring the real-ear-to-coupler difference (RECD) in young infants.
    Bagatto MP; Seewald RC; Scollie SD; Tharpe AM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Sep; 17(8):573-81. PubMed ID: 16999252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.