These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10708251)

  • 61. Prospective independent validation of IMPACT modeling as a prognostic tool in severe traumatic brain injury.
    Panczykowski DM; Puccio AM; Scruggs BJ; Bauer JS; Hricik AJ; Beers SR; Okonkwo DO
    J Neurotrauma; 2012 Jan; 29(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 21933014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Forewarning of hypotensive events using a Bayesian artificial neural network in neurocritical care.
    Donald R; Howells T; Piper I; Enblad P; Nilsson P; Chambers I; Gregson B; Citerio G; Kiening K; Neumann J; Ragauskas A; Sahuquillo J; Sinnott R; Stell A;
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2019 Feb; 33(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 29799079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Neural network assessment of perioperative cardiac risk in vascular surgery patients.
    Lapuerta P; L'Italien GJ; Paul S; Hendel RC; Leppo JA; Fleisher LA; Cohen MC; Eagle KA; Giugliano RP
    Med Decis Making; 1998; 18(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 9456211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Prediction of in-hospital mortality after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using an artificial neural network.
    Wise ES; Hocking KM; Brophy CM
    J Vasc Surg; 2015 Jul; 62(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 25953014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Easy and low-cost identification of metabolic syndrome in patients treated with second-generation antipsychotics: artificial neural network and logistic regression models.
    Lin CC; Bai YM; Chen JY; Hwang TJ; Chen TT; Chiu HW; Li YC
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2010 Mar; 71(3):225-34. PubMed ID: 19814949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Comparative analysis of logistic regression and artificial neural network for computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses.
    Song JH; Venkatesh SS; Conant EA; Arger PH; Sehgal CM
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Apr; 12(4):487-95. PubMed ID: 15831423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Simulation studies of data classification by artificial neural networks: potential applications in medical imaging and decision making.
    Wu Y; Doi K; Metz CE; Asada N; Giger ML
    J Digit Imaging; 1993 May; 6(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 8334172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Advanced integrated technique in breast cancer thermography.
    Ng EY; Kee EC
    J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 17852648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Comparison of logistic and neural network models to fit to the egg production curve of White Leghorn hens.
    Savegnago RP; Nunes BN; Caetano SL; Ferraudo AS; Schmidt GS; Ledur MC; Munari DP
    Poult Sci; 2011 Mar; 90(3):705-11. PubMed ID: 21325246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Rules versus layers: which side wins the battle of model calibration?
    Sakieh Y; Salmanmahiny A; Mirkarimi SH
    Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Nov; 188(11):633. PubMed ID: 27771873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Simplifying the use of prognostic information in traumatic brain injury. Part 2: Graphical presentation of probabilities.
    Murray GD; Brennan PM; Teasdale GM
    J Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 128(6):1621-1634. PubMed ID: 29631517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Modern modeling techniques had limited external validity in predicting mortality from traumatic brain injury.
    van der Ploeg T; Nieboer D; Steyerberg EW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Oct; 78():83-89. PubMed ID: 26987507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Predicting risk for portal vein thrombosis in acute pancreatitis patients: A comparison of radical basis function artificial neural network and logistic regression models.
    Fei Y; Hu J; Gao K; Tu J; Li WQ; Wang W
    J Crit Care; 2017 Jun; 39():115-123. PubMed ID: 28246056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Machine learning models in breast cancer survival prediction.
    Montazeri M; Montazeri M; Montazeri M; Beigzadeh A
    Technol Health Care; 2016; 24(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 26409558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Tau proteins in serum predict outcome after severe traumatic brain injury.
    Liliang PC; Liang CL; Weng HC; Lu K; Wang KW; Chen HJ; Chuang JH
    J Surg Res; 2010 May; 160(2):302-7. PubMed ID: 19345376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The effect of age on Glasgow Coma Scale score in patients with traumatic brain injury.
    Salottolo K; Levy AS; Slone DS; Mains CW; Bar-Or D
    JAMA Surg; 2014 Jul; 149(7):727-34. PubMed ID: 24899145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Prediction of outcome in critically ill patients using artificial neural network synthesised by genetic algorithm.
    Dybowski R; Weller P; Chang R; Gant V
    Lancet; 1996 Apr; 347(9009):1146-50. PubMed ID: 8609749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Calvarial eosinophilic granuloma: diagnostic models and image feature selection with a neural network.
    Arana E; Martí-Bonmatí L; Bautista D; Paredes R
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Jun; 5(6):427-34. PubMed ID: 9615153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Prognostic models for prediction of outcomes after traumatic brain injury based on patients admission characteristics.
    Kamal VK; Agrawal D; Pandey RM
    Brain Inj; 2016; 30(4):393-406. PubMed ID: 27003280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.