247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10708618)
1. The meaning of diagnostic test results: a spreadsheet for swift data analysis.
Maceneaney PM; Malone DE
Clin Radiol; 2000 Mar; 55(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 10708618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Applying 'evidence-based medicine' theory to interventional radiology. Part 2: a spreadsheet for swift assessment of procedural benefit and harm.
Maceneaney PM; Malone DE
Clin Radiol; 2000 Dec; 55(12):938-45. PubMed ID: 11124073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayes' theorem and diagnostic tests in neuropsychology: interval estimates for post-test probabilities.
Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Betkowska K
Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 May; 23(4):624-44. PubMed ID: 19235634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New patient-oriented diagnostic test characteristics analogous to the likelihood ratios conveyed information on trustworthiness.
Linn S
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 May; 58(5):450-7. PubMed ID: 15845331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian clinical reasoning: does intuitive estimation of likelihood ratios on an ordinal scale outperform estimation of sensitivities and specificities?
Moreira J; Bisoffi Z; Narváez A; Van den Ende J
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):934-40. PubMed ID: 19018928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Roaming through methodology. XXXVI. Likelihood ratios and Bayes' rule].
Vermeulen M
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Dec; 145(50):2421-4. PubMed ID: 11776667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Calculating confidence intervals for threshold and post-test probabilities.
Hozo I; Djulbegovic B
MD Comput; 1998; 15(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 9540324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Confidence in polymerase chain reaction diagnosis can be improved by Bayesian estimation of post-test disease probability.
Kelly P; Pereira-Maxwell F; Carnaby S; White I
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 15718114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical methods in epidemiology. VIII. On the use of likelihood ratios for diagnostic testing with an application to general practice.
Rigby AS; Summerton N
Disabil Rehabil; 2005 May; 27(9):475-80. PubMed ID: 16040551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic testing, pre- and post-test probabilities, and their use in clinical practice.
Paulo S; Mendes S; Vizinho R; Carneiro AV
Rev Port Cardiol; 2004 Sep; 23(9):1187-98. PubMed ID: 15587576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Likelihood ratios, sensitivity, and specificity values can be back-calculated when the odds ratios are known.
Simel DL; Easter J; Tomlinson G
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Apr; 66(4):458-60. PubMed ID: 23021858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Likelihood ratio estimation without a gold standard: a case study evaluating a brucellosis c-ELISA in cattle and water buffalo of Trinidad.
Fosgate GT; Adesiyun AA; Hird DW; Hietala SK
Prev Vet Med; 2006 Aug; 75(3-4):189-205. PubMed ID: 16600408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Stepwise diagnostic workup in general practice as a consequence of the Bayesian reasoning].
Schneider A; Dinant GJ; Szecsenyi J
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2006; 100(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 16686446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incorporating uncertainty into medical decision making: an approach to unexpected test results.
Bianchi MT; Alexander BM; Cash SS
Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 18812583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Diagnostic accuracy].
Simundić AM
Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():93-111. PubMed ID: 16526310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a spreadsheet for the calculation of new tools to improve the reporting of the results of medical research.
Shakespeare TP; Gebski VJ; Thiagarajan A; Jay Lu J
Med Inform Internet Med; 2006 Jun; 31(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 16777786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnosis using predictive probabilities without cut-offs.
Choi YK; Johnson WO; Thurmond MC
Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(4):699-717. PubMed ID: 16220514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving the diagnosis of bipolar disorder: predictive value of screening tests.
Phelps JR; Ghaemi SN
J Affect Disord; 2006 Jun; 92(2-3):141-8. PubMed ID: 16529822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Understanding diagnostic tests 2: likelihood ratios, pre- and post-test probabilities and their use in clinical practice.
Akobeng AK
Acta Paediatr; 2007 Apr; 96(4):487-91. PubMed ID: 17306009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. From diagnostic accuracy to accurate diagnosis: interpreting a test result with confidence.
Zou G
Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 15155020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
