These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10708664)
1. Efficacy of aqueous suspension and granular formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis (Vectobac) against mosquito vectors. Dominic Amalraj D; Sahu SS; Jambulingam P; Boopathi Doss PS; Kalyanasundaram M; Das PK Acta Trop; 2000 Mar; 75(2):243-6. PubMed ID: 10708664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of a new granular formulation of biolarvicide Bacillus thuringiensis Var. israelensis against larvae of malaria vectors in India. Tiwari S; Ghosh SK; Mittal PK; Dash AP Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis; 2011 Jan; 11(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 20491582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Field evaluation of biolarvicides in Surat city, India. Haq S; Bhatt RM; Vaishnav KG; Yadav RS J Vector Borne Dis; 2004; 41(3-4):61-6. PubMed ID: 15672558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Field testing & evaluation of the efficacy & duration of effectiveness of a biolarvicide, Bactivec Uragayala S; Kamaraju R; Tiwari S; Ghosh SK; Valecha N Indian J Med Res; 2018 Mar; 147(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 29923520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Insecticidal potency of bacterial species Bacillus thuringiensis SV2 and Serratia nematodiphila SV6 against larvae of mosquito species Aedes aegypti, Anopheles stephensi, and Culex quinquefasciatus. Patil CD; Patil SV; Salunke BK; Salunkhe RB Parasitol Res; 2012 May; 110(5):1841-7. PubMed ID: 22065062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Field evaluation of Spicbiomoss, a biolarvicidal formulation of Bacillus sphaericus against immatures of Culex quinquefasciatus & Anopheles species. Mariappan T; Amalraj DD; Doss PS; Sahu SS; Jambulingam P; Somachary N; Reddy CM; Kalyanasundaram M; Das PK Indian J Med Res; 1999 Oct; 110():128-32. PubMed ID: 10645100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of two organophosphorus insecticides, Reldan & Dursban against the larvae of Culex quinquefasciatus. Kalyanasundaran M; Jambulingam P; Sahu SS; Doss PS; Amalraj DD; Das PK Indian J Med Res; 2003 Jan; 117():25-9. PubMed ID: 12866823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Indoor thermal fogging against vector mosquitoes with two Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis formulations, Vectobac ABG 6511 water-dispersible granules and Vectobac 12AS liquid. Yap HH; Lee YW; Zairi J J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2002 Mar; 18(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 11998931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of a new formulation of Bacillus thuringiensis var israelensis (Bti) in laboratory and field conditions of Kumaun foothills of Uttaranchal, India. Sharma SN; Shukla RP; Mittal PK; Adak T; Kumar A J Commun Dis; 2003 Dec; 35(4):290-9. PubMed ID: 15909759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative toxicity of selected larvicidal formulations against Anopheles stephensi Liston and Aedes aegypti Linn. Mittal PK; Adak T; Batra CP J Commun Dis; 2001 Jun; 33(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 12170930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Field efficacy of Vectobac GR as a mosquito larvicide for the control of anopheline and culicine mosquitoes in natural habitats in Benin, West Africa. Djènontin A; Pennetier C; Zogo B; Soukou KB; Ole-Sangba M; Akogbéto M; Chandre F; Yadav R; Corbel V PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e87934. PubMed ID: 24505334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laboratory and field evaluation of Teknar HP-D, a biolarvicidal formulation of Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. israelensis, against mosquito vectors. Gunasekaran K; Doss PS; Vaidyanathan K Acta Trop; 2004 Oct; 92(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 15350862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mosquito larvicidal potential of silver nanoparticles synthesized using Chomelia asiatica (Rubiaceae) against Anopheles stephensi, Aedes aegypti, and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae). Muthukumaran U; Govindarajan M; Rajeswary M Parasitol Res; 2015 Mar; 114(3):989-99. PubMed ID: 25544703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laboratory and field efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis var. Israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus against Anopheles gambiae s.l. and Culex quinquefasciatus in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Majori G; Ali A; Sabatinelli G J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1987 Mar; 3(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 3504891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of three microbial formulations against Culex pipiens pipiens larvae in irrigation fields in Wroclaw, Poland. Rydzanicz K; Lonc E; Kiewra D; Dechant P; Krause S; Becker N J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2009 Jun; 25(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 19653495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis, Bacillus sphaericus and temephos for managing Anopheles larvae in Eritrea. Shililu JI; Tewolde GM; Brantly E; Githure JI; Mbogo CM; Beier JC; Fusco R; Novak RJ J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2003 Sep; 19(3):251-8. PubMed ID: 14524547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of the triflumuron and the mixture of Bacillus thuringiensis plus Bacillus sphaericus for control of the immature stages of Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) in catch basins]. Giraldo-Calderón GI; Pérez M; Morales CA; Ocampo CB Biomedica; 2008 Jun; 28(2):224-33. PubMed ID: 18719724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]