These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10709038)

  • 1. Dimensional accuracy of an epoxy resin die material using two setting methods.
    Paquette JM; Taniguchi T; White SN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 10709038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dimensional accuracy of an epoxy die material using different polymerization methods.
    Prisco R; Cozzolino G; Vigolo P
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 19054302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of few physical properties of epoxy resin, resin-modified gypsum and conventional type IV gypsum die materials: an in vitro study.
    Gujjarlapudi MC; Reddy SV; Madineni PK; Ealla KK; Nunna VN; Manne SD
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 22430693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Study of the physical properties of type IV gypsum, resin-containing, and epoxy die materials.
    Duke P; Moore BK; Haug SP; Andres CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Apr; 83(4):466-73. PubMed ID: 10756298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dimensional accuracy of improved dental stone and epoxy resin die materials. Part I: Single die.
    Chaffee NR; Bailey JH; Sherrard DJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Feb; 77(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 9051599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abrasion resistance of a resin-impregnated type IV gypsum in comparison to conventional products.
    Lindquist TJ; Stanford CM; Mostafavi H; Xie XJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Mar; 87(3):319-22. PubMed ID: 11941359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of transverse strength and dimensional variations between die stone, die epoxy resin, and die polyurethane resin.
    Derrien G; Sturtz G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Dec; 74(6):569-74. PubMed ID: 8778379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dimensional accuracy of 7 die materials.
    Kenyon BJ; Hagge MS; Leknius C; Daniels WC; Weed ST
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Mar; 14(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 15733132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of dimensional accuracy of four different die materials before and after disinfection of the impression: an in vitro study.
    Nandini Y; Vinitha KB; Manvi S; Smitha M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):668-74. PubMed ID: 24309347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linear dimensional changes in plaster die models using different elastomeric materials.
    Pereira JR; Murata KY; Valle AL; Ghizoni JS; Shiratori FK
    Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(3):336-41. PubMed ID: 20877972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Margin adaptation of indirect composite inlays fabricated on flexible dies.
    Price RB; Gerrow JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 10709039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of surface hardener on gypsum abrasion resistance and water sorption.
    Lindquist TJ; Stanford CM; Knox E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Nov; 90(5):441-6. PubMed ID: 14586307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of the accuracy of three die systems.
    Bloem TJ; Czerniawski B; Luke J; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):758-62. PubMed ID: 2072316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of measurement site on the dimensional accuracy of die-forming materials and techniques.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP; Theodotou N; Glaros AG; Williams K
    Gen Dent; 2004; 52(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 15206253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Schleier PE; Gardner FM; Nelson SK; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of a chemical disinfectant on the physical properties of dental stones.
    Hall BD; Muñoz-Viveros CA; Naylor WP; Sy J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 15008235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
    Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of adding a stone base on the accuracy of working casts using different types of dental stone.
    Al-Abidi K; Ellakwa A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep; 7(4):17-28. PubMed ID: 16957787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of detail reproduction for three die materials by using scanning electron microscopy and two-dimensional profilometry.
    Derrien G; Le Menn G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 7674178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.