440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10709039)
1. Margin adaptation of indirect composite inlays fabricated on flexible dies.
Price RB; Gerrow JD
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 10709039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the surface detail reproduction of flexible die material systems.
Gerrow JD; Price RB
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 9791798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ability of various impression materials to produce duplicate dies from successive impressions.
Morgano SM; Milot P; Ducharme P; Rose L
J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Apr; 73(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 7783010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of impression tray design and impression technique upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Taylor WG
J Dent; 1991 Oct; 19(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 1806594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique.
Dogan S; Schwedhelm ER; Heindl H; Mancl L; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 25976708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dimensional accuracy of a new polyether impression material.
Endo T; Finger WJ
Quintessence Int; 2006 Jan; 37(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 16429703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal accuracy of indirect provisional restorations fabricated on poly(vinyl siloxane) models.
Moulding MB; Loney RW; Ritsco RG
Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(6):554-8. PubMed ID: 7748451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental study on the use of spacer foils in two-step putty and wash impression procedures using silicone impression materials.
Mann K; Davids A; Range U; Richter G; Boening K; Reitemeier B
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 25453563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of different methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlays created with CEREC 3D.
da Costa JB; Pelogia F; Hagedorn B; Ferracane JL
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 20533633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal fit of indirect composite inlays using a new system for manual fabrication.
Pott P; Rzasa A; Stiesch M; Eisenburger M
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):223-226. PubMed ID: 27759412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of wash bulk on the accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impressions.
Nissan J; Gross M; Shifman A; Assif D
J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Apr; 29(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 11966969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of various putty-wash impression techniques on marginal fit of cast crowns.
Nissan J; Rosner O; Bukhari MA; Ghelfan O; Pilo R
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(1):e37-42. PubMed ID: 23342356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion.
Johnson GH; Chellis KD; Gordon GE; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 79(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 9576321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of pre-heated composites and flowable liners on Class II gingival margin gap formation.
Sabatini C; Blunck U; Denehy G; Munoz C
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):663-71. PubMed ID: 21180006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dimensional stability of two visible light-cured indirect inlay/onlay resin composite materials.
Lynde TA; Schulman LB; Meiers JC; Whitehill JM
Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):153-6. PubMed ID: 9002790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Linear dimensional accuracy of a polyvinyl siloxane of varying viscosities using different impression techniques.
Mishra S; Chowdhary R
J Investig Clin Dent; 2010 Aug; 1(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 25427185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of three polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques.
Nissan J; Laufer BZ; Brosh T; Assif D
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Feb; 83(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 10668027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
