307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10709224)
1. How to program rate responsive pacemakers.
Greco EM; Guardini S; Ferrario M; Romano S
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Feb; 23(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 10709224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of peak endocardial acceleration as a sensor for rate responsive pacing.
Greco EM; Ferrario M; Romano S
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Apr; 26(4 Pt 1):812-8. PubMed ID: 12715840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cardiac rehabilitation in patients with rate responsive pacemakers.
Greco EM; Guardini S; Citelli L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Mar; 21(3):568-75. PubMed ID: 9558689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of the pacing rate on the atrioventricular conduction time during aerobic and anaerobic exercise: basic concepts for a dromotropically controlled rate responsive pacemaker.
Meine M; Hexamer M; Werner J; Israel CW; Mügge A; Lemke B; Barmeyer J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Dec; 22(12):1782-91. PubMed ID: 10642132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-year experience with rate-modulated pacing controlled by mixed venous oxygen saturation.
Windecker S; Bubien RS; Halperin L; Moore A; Kay GN
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jul; 21(7):1396-404. PubMed ID: 9670183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the cardiopulmonary response to exercise in recipients of dual sensor DDDR pacemakers Versus a Healthy control group.
Page E; Defaye P; Bonnet JL; Durand C; Amblard A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Jan; 26(1P2):239-43. PubMed ID: 12687820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of maximum heart rate on oxygen kinetics and exercise performance at low and high workloads.
Carmouche DG; Bubien RS; Kay GN
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Apr; 21(4 Pt 1):679-86. PubMed ID: 9584297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Initial clinical experience with a new dual sensor SSIR pacemaker controlled by body activity and minute ventilation.
Alt E; Combs W; Fotuhi P; Bambl E; Wahlstrand J; Willhaus R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Aug; 18(8):1487-95. PubMed ID: 7479170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can current minute ventilation rate adaptive pacemakers provide appropriate chronotropic response in pediatric patients?
Cabrera ME; Portzline G; Aach S; Condie C; Dorostkar P; Mianulli M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2002 Jun; 25(6):907-14. PubMed ID: 12137342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of chronotropic response pattern on oxygen kinetics.
Dailey SM; Bubien RS; Kay GN
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Dec; 17(12 Pt 1):2307-14. PubMed ID: 7885940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of cardiac resynchronisation therapy on adaptation of circulatory and respiratory systems to exercise assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise test in patients with chronic heart failure.
Chwyczko T; Sterliński M; Maciag A; Firek B; Labecka A; Jankowska A; Kośmicki M; Kowalik I; Malczewska B; Szwed H
Kardiol Pol; 2008 Apr; 66(4):406-12; discussion 413-4. PubMed ID: 18473269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rate-modulated cardiac pacing based on transthoracic impedance measurements of minute ventilation: correlation with exercise gas exchange.
Kay GN; Bubien RS; Epstein AE; Plumb VJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Nov; 14(5):1283-9. PubMed ID: 2808984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of normal sinus rhythm and pacing rate in children with minute ventilation single chamber rate adaptive permanent pacemakers.
Celiker A; Ceviz N; Alehan D; Lenk MK; Ozme S
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Nov; 21(11 Pt 1):2100-4. PubMed ID: 9826863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of sensor selection on exercise stroke volume in pacemaker dependent patients.
Haennel RG; Logan T; Dunne C; Burgess J; Busse E
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Sep; 21(9):1700-8. PubMed ID: 9744431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Dual chamber rate responsive pacing and chronotropic insufficiency. Comparison of double and respiratory sensors].
Lascault G; Pansard Y; Scholl JM; Abraham P; Dupuis JM; Victor J; Copie X; Alonso C; Sarrazin E
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2001 Mar; 94(3):190-5. PubMed ID: 11338253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Importance of AV synchronous pacing during low intensity exercise evaluated by oxygen kinetics.
Rickli H; Brunner-La Rocca HP; Maccarter DJ; Duru F; Candinas R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Feb; 23(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 10709225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Failure of rate responsive ventricular pacing to improve physiological performance in the univentricular heart.
Karpawich PP; Paridon SM; Pinsky WW
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Nov; 14(11 Pt 2):2058-61. PubMed ID: 1721224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of adaptive rate response provided by accelerometer, minute ventilation and dual sensor compared with normal sinus rhythm during exercise: a self-controlled study in chronotropically competent subjects.
Cao Y; Zhang Y; Su Y; Bai J; Wang W; Ge J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Jan; 128(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 25563309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of rate responsive pacing on exercise performance in the postoperative univentricular heart.
Paridon SM; Karpawich PP; Pinsky WW
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Jun; 16(6):1256-62. PubMed ID: 7686655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cardiac output is a sensitive indicator of difference in exercise performance between single and dual sensor pacemakers.
Leung SK; Lau CP; Tang MO
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jan; 21(1 Pt 1):35-41. PubMed ID: 9474646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
