These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10709478)

  • 1. Evaluation of the effects of restorative materials used for occlusal surfaces of implant-supported prostheses on force distribution.
    Inan O; Kesim B
    Implant Dent; 1999; 8(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 10709478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determining the force absorption quotient for restorative materials used in implant occlusal surfaces.
    Cibirka RM; Razzoog ME; Lang BR; Stohler CS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Mar; 67(3):361-4. PubMed ID: 1507102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations.
    Ciftçi Y; Canay S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):571-82. PubMed ID: 10960992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shock absorption capacity of restorative materials for dental implant prostheses: an in vitro study.
    Menini M; Conserva E; Tealdo T; Bevilacqua M; Pera F; Signori A; Pera P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 24179969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stress dissipation in the bone through various crown materials of dental implant restoration: a 2-D finite element analysis.
    Bijjargi S; Chowdhary R
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Aug; 4(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 23172842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: A three-dimensional finite element study.
    Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A; Sevimay M; Soykan E; Unsal E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Feb; 91(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 14970760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Photoelastic analysis of stresses transmitted by universal cast to long abutment on implant-supported single restorations under static occlusal loads.
    Aguiar FA; Tiossi R; Macedo AP; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF; Rodrigues RC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2019-23. PubMed ID: 23154374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stress distribution on the metal framework of the implant-supported fixed prosthesis using different veneering materials.
    Ciftçi Y; Canay S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):406-11. PubMed ID: 12066633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shock-absorbing behavior of five restorative materials used on implants.
    Gracis SE; Nicholls JI; Chalupnik JD; Yuodelis RA
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(3):282-91. PubMed ID: 1810320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical comparison of implant retained fixed partial dentures with fiber reinforced composite versus conventional metal frameworks: a 3D FEA study.
    Erkmen E; Meriç G; Kurt A; Tunç Y; Eser A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Jan; 4(1):107-16. PubMed ID: 21094484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses.
    Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finite element analysis study of the effect of superstructure material on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis.
    Sertgöz A
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9484066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal fit and photoelastic stress analysis of CAD-CAM and overcast 3-unit implant-supported frameworks.
    Presotto AG; Bhering CL; Mesquita MF; Barão VA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 27666497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of prosthesis materials and prosthesis splinting on peri-implant bone stress around implants in poor-quality bone: a numeric analysis.
    Wang TM; Leu LJ; Wang J; Lin LD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 11958406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of mandibular deformation, implant numbers, and loading position on detected forces in abutments supporting fixed implant superstructures.
    Hobkirk JA; Havthoulas TK
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Aug; 80(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 9710818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Photoelastic analysis of the influence of prosthetic material on the stress distribution in bone around implant].
    Zhang SJ; Zeng JY; Li J; Zhang R; Yin JY; Wang H
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jan; 53(1):30-35. PubMed ID: 29972961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of prosthesis material on stress distribution in bone and implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Stegaroiu R; Kusakari H; Nishiyama S; Miyakawa O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 9857588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in vitro study of the effect of different restorative materials on the reliability of a veneering porcelain.
    Anderson MR; Chung KH; Flinn BD; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Dec; 110(6):521-8. PubMed ID: 24189113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of superstructure materials on strain around an implant under 2 loading conditions: a technical investigation.
    Stegaroiu R; Khraisat A; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):735-42. PubMed ID: 15508991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.