These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10709505)

  • 1. Preliminary study of the forces developed by practitioners during amalgam condensation.
    Blum JY; Micallef JP
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1999 Aug; 19(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 10709505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in-vitro investigation of variables influencing mercury vapor release from dental amalgam.
    Neme AL; Maxson BB; Linger JB; Abbott LJ
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 11817472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of forces developed during obturations. Wedging effect: Part I.
    Blum JY; Machtou P; Micallef JP
    J Endod; 1998 Apr; 24(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 9641121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of forces developed during obturations. Wedging effect: Part II.
    Blum JY; Machtou P; Micallef JP
    J Endod; 1998 Apr; 24(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 9641122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of the endogrammes developed during obturations on extracted teeth using system B.
    Blum JY; Cathala C; Machtou P; Micallef JP
    J Endod; 2001 Nov; 27(11):661-5. PubMed ID: 11716076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro bond strengths of amalgam added to existing amalgams.
    Roggenkamp CL; Berry FA; Lu H
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):314-23. PubMed ID: 20533632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of the forces developed during obturation: warm vertical compaction.
    Blum JY; Parahy E; Micallef JP
    J Endod; 1997 Feb; 23(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 9220737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient.
    Blum JY; Machtou P; Ruddle C; Micallef JP
    J Endod; 2003 Sep; 29(9):567-75. PubMed ID: 14503829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of sodium hypochlorite and EDTA on mercury released from amalgam.
    Rotstein I; Karawani M; Sahar-Helft S; Mor C; Steinberg D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Nov; 92(5):556-60. PubMed ID: 11709693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-body sliding wear of a direct-filling silver alternative to amalgam.
    Xu HH; Giuseppetti AA; Eichmiller FC; Ives LK
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Mar; 30(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 10356574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of inductively coupled plasma-emission spectroscopy and mercury vapor analyses to evaluate elemental release from a high-copper dental amalgam: a pilot study.
    Cohen BI; Penugonda B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):409-12. PubMed ID: 11319540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of oscillation and low seating forces on pulpward pressure transmission and seating during crown cementation: a laboratory study.
    Humplik AJ; Wilson PR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 11842906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptation of eight modern dental amalgams to walls of Class I cavity preparations.
    Symons AL; Wing G; Hewitt GH
    J Oral Rehabil; 1987 Jan; 14(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 3469377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Qualitative description of a new preparation technique: the balanced-force motion using the Endographe.
    Blum JY; Machtou P; Micallef JP
    J Endod; 2001 Aug; 27(8):503-7. PubMed ID: 11501586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of a refrigerated amalgam bonding system on fracture resistance.
    Hagge MS; Lindemuth JS
    Gen Dent; 2002; 50(1):52-5; quiz 56-7. PubMed ID: 12029797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.