196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10710740)
1. Endometrial biopsy using the Tao Brush method. A study of 50 women in a general gynecologic practice.
Yang GC; Wan LS
J Reprod Med; 2000 Feb; 45(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 10710740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors affecting adequacy of Pipelle and Tao Brush endometrial sampling.
Williams AR; Brechin S; Porter AJ; Warner P; Critchley HO
BJOG; 2008 Jul; 115(8):1028-36. PubMed ID: 18651884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endometrial brush biopsy for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer.
Del Priore G; Williams R; Harbatkin CB; Wan LS; Mittal K; Yang GC
J Reprod Med; 2001 May; 46(5):439-43. PubMed ID: 11396369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pipelle versus fractional curettage for the endometrial sampling in postmenopausal women.
Bunyavejchevin S; Triratanachat S; Kankeow K; Limpaphayom KK
J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Jun; 84 Suppl 1():S326-30. PubMed ID: 11529353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors influencing the detection of uterine cancer by suction curettage and endometrial brushing.
Yang GC; Wan LS; Del Priore G
J Reprod Med; 2002 Dec; 47(12):1005-10. PubMed ID: 12516318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of endometrial biopsy with the endometrial Pipelle and Vabra aspirator.
Kaunitz AM; Masciello A; Ostrowski M; Rovira EZ
J Reprod Med; 1988 May; 33(5):427-31. PubMed ID: 3385697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of Pipelle Mark II sampling in endometrial disease diagnosis.
Polena V; Mergui JL; Zerat L; Sananes S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Oct; 134(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 17029754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Novak and Pipelle endometrial biopsy instruments.
Silver MM; Miles P; Rosa C
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):828-30. PubMed ID: 1923207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with known endometrial carcinoma.
Stovall TG; Photopulos GJ; Poston WM; Ling FW; Sandles LG
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jun; 77(6):954-6. PubMed ID: 2030877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Direct uterine sampling with the Tao brush sampler using a liquid-based preparation method for the detection of endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia: a feasibility study.
Kipp BR; Medeiros F; Campion MB; Distad TJ; Peterson LM; Keeney GL; Halling KC; Clayton AC
Cancer; 2008 Aug; 114(4):228-35. PubMed ID: 18548528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Different methods for the diagnosis of endometrial histological comparative study].
Leng X; Wang M; Zhang SL; Wang D; Cao W; Yang XH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 48(12):891-5. PubMed ID: 24495679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of late luteal phase endometrial biopsies using the Novak curette or PIPELLE endometrial suction curette.
Hill GA; Herbert CM; Parker RA; Wentz AC
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Mar; 73(3 Pt 1):443-5. PubMed ID: 2915869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vabra aspirator and pipelle endometrial suction curette. A comparison.
Manganiello PD; Burrows LJ; Dain BJ; Gonzalez J
J Reprod Med; 1998 Oct; 43(10):889-92. PubMed ID: 9800672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pipelle endometrial sampling. Sensitivity in the detection of endometrial cancer.
Guido RS; Kanbour-Shakir A; Rulin MC; Christopherson WA
J Reprod Med; 1995 Aug; 40(8):553-5. PubMed ID: 7473450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outpatient endometrial biopsy with Pipelle vs diagnostic dilatation and curettage.
Rauf R; Shaheen A; Sadia S; Waqar F; Zafar S; Sultana S; Waseem S
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2014; 26(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 25603664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance characteristics of the Indiana University Medical Center endometrial sampler (Tao Brush) in an outpatient office setting, first year's outcomes: recognizing histological patterns in cytology preparations of endometrial brushings.
Maksem JA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Mar; 22(3):186-95. PubMed ID: 10680001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the success of histopathological diagnosis with dilatation-curettage and Pipelle endometrial sampling.
Kazandi M; Okmen F; Ergenoglu AM; Yeniel AO; Zeybek B; Zekioglu O; Ozdemir N
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Nov; 32(8):790-4. PubMed ID: 23075358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomised trial comparing the H Pipelle with the standard Pipelle for endometrial sampling at 'no-touch' (vaginoscopic) hysteroscopy.
Madari S; Al-Shabibi N; Papalampros P; Papadimitriou A; Magos A
BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 19087077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Devices for endometrial sampling. A comparison.
Mishell DR; Kaunitz AM
J Reprod Med; 1998 Mar; 43(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 9564641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of the Pipelle endometrial suction curette for timed endometrial biopsies.
Check JH; Chase JS; Nowroozi K; Wu CH; Chern R
J Reprod Med; 1989 Mar; 34(3):218-20. PubMed ID: 2724236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]