81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10711540)
1. Comparison of immediate and deferred colposcopy in a cervical screening program.
Parham GP; Andrews NR; Lee ML
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Mar; 95(3):340-4. PubMed ID: 10711540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of speculoscopy in the evaluation of women with atypical Papanicolaou smears. Improved cost effectiveness by selective colposcopy.
Massad LS; Lonky NM; Mutch DG; Mann WJ; Blanco JS; Vasilev SA; Finan MA; Scotti RJ
J Reprod Med; 1993 Mar; 38(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 8387595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of the Papanicolaou smear and speculoscopy as compared with the Papanicolaou smear alone: a community-based clinical trial.
Wertlake PT; Francus K; Newkirk GR; Parham GP
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 90(3):421-7. PubMed ID: 9277656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ability of visual tests to predict underlying cervical neoplasia. Colposcopy and speculoscopy.
Lonky NM; Mann WJ; Massad LS; Mutch DG; Blanco JS; Vasilev SA; Finan MA; Scotti RJ
J Reprod Med; 1995 Jul; 40(7):530-6. PubMed ID: 7473444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The evaluation of cervical cancer screening by combining speculoscopy with Papanicolaou smear examination in Taiwan.
Chang JI; Ou CH; Wu KM; Chen CC; Cheng KC
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2002 Sep; 65(9):430-4. PubMed ID: 12433029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preliminary comparison of papanicolaou smear and speculoscopy for assessing cervical cancer precursor lesions in pregnant adolescents.
Shulman LP; Klett CC; Phillips OP
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 1999 May; 12(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 10326192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improvement of Pap smear sensitivity using a visual adjunctive procedure: a co-operative Italian study on speculoscopy (GISPE).
Loiudice L; Abbiati R; Boselli F; Cecchini G; Costa S; Grossi E; Piccoli R; Villani C
Eur J Cancer Prev; 1998 Aug; 7(4):295-304. PubMed ID: 9806118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Italian experience of a Pap test and speculoscopy based screening programme.
Boselli F; De Martis S; Rivasi F; Toni A; Abbiati R; Chiossi G
J Med Screen; 2000; 7(3):160-2. PubMed ID: 11126166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening of cervical neoplasia by using pap smear with speculoscopy compared with pap smear alone.
Boonlikit S; Supakarapongkul W; Preuksaritanond N; Vipupinyo C; Tuipae S; Mangclaviras S; Karnplumjid S; Chantarawiroj P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Feb; 88(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 15962661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved cervical cancer screening in premenopausal women by combination of Pap smear and speculoscopy.
Twu NF; Chen YJ; Wang PH; Yu BK; Lai CR; Chao KC; Yuan CC; Yen MS
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Jul; 133(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 16797826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Women with human immunodeficiency virus infection and abnormal Papanicolaou smears: a prospective study of colposcopy and clinical outcome.
Adachi A; Fleming I; Burk RD; Ho GY; Klein RS
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 81(3):372-7. PubMed ID: 8437789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The costs, clinical benefits, and cost-effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer in HIV-infected women.
Goldie SJ; Weinstein MC; Kuntz KM; Freedberg KA
Ann Intern Med; 1999 Jan; 130(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 10068381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Liquid-based Papanicolaou smears without a transformation zone component: should clinicians worry?
Baer A; Kiviat NB; Kulasingam S; Mao C; Kuypers J; Koutsky LA
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 99(6):1053-9. PubMed ID: 12052599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Colposcopic survey of Papanicolaou test-negative cases with hyperkeratosis or parakeratosis.
Cecchini S; Iossa A; Ciatto S; Bonardi L; Confortini M; Cipparrone G
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Nov; 76(5 Pt 1):857-9. PubMed ID: 2170888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speculoscopy vs. the acetic acid test for cervical neoplasia.
Cronjé HS; van Rensburg E; Cooreman BF; Niemand I; Beyer E
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2000 Jun; 69(3):249-53. PubMed ID: 10854867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efforts to improve the follow-up of patients with abnormal Papanicolaou test results.
Block B; Branham RA
J Am Board Fam Pract; 1998; 11(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 9456441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speculoscopy as Pap Smear Adjunct.
Park CH
Cancer Res Treat; 2003 Dec; 35(6):541-8. PubMed ID: 26680988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incidence and evaluation of an AGUS Papanicolaou smear in primary care.
Valdini A; Vaccaro C; Pechinsky G; Abernathy V
J Am Board Fam Pract; 2001; 14(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 11355048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Colposcopic evaluation of the abnormal Papanicolaou test in pregnancy.
DePetrillo AD; Townsend DE; Morrow CP; Lickrish GM; DiSaia PJ; Roy M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Feb; 121(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 1146871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative utility of repeat Papanicolaou smears, cervicography, and colposcopy in the evaluation of atypical Papanicolaou smears.
Spitzer M; Krumholz BA; Chernys AE; Seltzer V; Lightman AR
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 69(5):731-5. PubMed ID: 3106869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
