204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10712222)
1. Bias and efficiency in family-based gene-characterization studies: conditional, prospective, retrospective, and joint likelihoods.
Kraft P; Thomas DC
Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Mar; 66(3):1119-31. PubMed ID: 10712222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of disease genes by use of family data. I. Likelihood-based theory.
Whittemore AS; Tu IP
Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1328-40. PubMed ID: 10739758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modeling hazard functions in families.
Siegmund K; McKnight B
Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(2):147-71. PubMed ID: 9554553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating penetrance from family data using a retrospective likelihood when ascertainment depends on genotype and age of onset.
Carayol J; Bonaïti-Pellié C
Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 27(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 15305327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors IV: joint pseudomarker analysis of linkage and/or linkage disequilibrium on a mixture of pedigrees and singletons when the mode of inheritance cannot be accurately specified.
Göring HH; Terwilliger JD
Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1310-27. PubMed ID: 10731466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Complexity and power in case-control association studies.
Longmate JA
Am J Hum Genet; 2001 May; 68(5):1229-37. PubMed ID: 11294658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correcting for ascertainment bias of relative-risk estimates obtained using affected-sib-pair linkage data.
Cordell HJ; Olson JM
Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):307-21. PubMed ID: 10797591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A note on a conditional-likelihood approach for family-based association studies of candidate genes.
Hsu L; Zhao LP; Aragaki C
Hum Hered; 2000; 50(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 10686500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Down-weighting of multiple affected sib pairs leads to biased likelihood-ratio tests, under the assumption of no linkage.
Greenwood CM; Bull SB
Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Apr; 64(4):1248-52. PubMed ID: 10090918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The relationship between the sibling recurrence-risk ratio and genotype relative risk.
Rybicki BA; Elston RC
Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Feb; 66(2):593-604. PubMed ID: 10677319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of tests for association and linkage in incomplete families.
Cervino AC; Hill AV
Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jul; 67(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 10841813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Power of segregation analysis for detection of major gene effects on quantitative traits.
Borecki IB; Province MA; Rao DC
Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 7835687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A study comparing precision of the maximum multipoint heterogeneity LOD statistic to three model-free multipoint linkage methods.
Finch SJ; Chen CH; Gordon D; Mendell NR
Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 21(4):315-25. PubMed ID: 11754467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimation of genotype relative risks from pedigree data by retrospective likelihoods.
Schaid DJ; McDonnell SK; Riska SM; Carlson EE; Thibodeau SN
Genet Epidemiol; 2010 May; 34(4):287-98. PubMed ID: 20039378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robustness of inference on measured covariates to misspecification of genetic random effects in family studies.
Pfeiffer RM; Hildesheim A; Gail MH; Pee D; Chen CJ; Goldstein AM; Diehl SR
Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 12508252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence for further breast cancer susceptibility genes in addition to BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a population-based study.
Antoniou AC; Pharoah PD; McMullan G; Day NE; Ponder BA; Easton D
Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jul; 21(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 11443730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating haplotype effects in case-control studies via penalized-likelihood approaches: prospective or retrospective analysis?
Koehler ML; Bondell HD; Tzeng JY
Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Dec; 34(8):892-911. PubMed ID: 21104891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A note on power approximations for the transmission/disequilibrium test.
Knapp M
Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Apr; 64(4):1177-85. PubMed ID: 10090903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Testing linkage disequilibrium in sibships.
Siegmund KD; Langholz B; Kraft P; Thomas DC
Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jul; 67(1):244-8. PubMed ID: 10831398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors III: marker loci and their map as nuisance parameters.
Göring HH; Terwilliger JD
Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1298-309. PubMed ID: 10731467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
