171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10712222)
21. Multilocus linkage tests based on affected relative pairs.
Cordell HJ; Wedig GC; Jacobs KB; Elston RC
Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1273-86. PubMed ID: 10729111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Genetic Analysis Workshop II: study of Problem 2 linkage relationships by different methods.
Demenais F; Darlu P
Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(2):171-4. PubMed ID: 14964299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The loss of statistical power to distinguish populations when certain samples are ambiguous.
O'Hely M; Slatkin M
Theor Popul Biol; 2003 Sep; 64(2):177-92. PubMed ID: 12948679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Estimating disease risk associated with mutated genes in family-based designs.
Choi YH; Kopciuk KA; Briollais L
Hum Hered; 2008; 66(4):238-51. PubMed ID: 18612208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A general and accurate approach for computing the statistical power of the transmission disequilibrium test for complex disease genes.
Chen WM; Deng HW
Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jul; 21(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 11443734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Segregation analyses of 1,476 population-based Australian families affected by prostate cancer.
Cui J; Staples MP; Hopper JL; English DR; McCredie MR; Giles GG
Am J Hum Genet; 2001 May; 68(5):1207-18. PubMed ID: 11309686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A unified sampling approach for multipoint analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits in sib pairs.
Liang KY; Huang CY; Beaty TH
Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1631-41. PubMed ID: 10762548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Power for genetic association studies with random allele frequencies and genotype distributions.
Ambrosius WT; Lange EM; Langefeld CD
Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Apr; 74(4):683-93. PubMed ID: 15024689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Statistical tests for detection of misspecified relationships by use of genome-screen data.
McPeek MS; Sun L
Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Mar; 66(3):1076-94. PubMed ID: 10712219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Class I and II HLA genes are associated with susceptibility and age at onset in Finnish families with type 1 diabetes.
Pitkäniemi J; Hakulinen T; Näsänen J; Tuomilehto-Wolf E; Tuomilehto J;
Hum Hered; 2004; 57(2):69-79. PubMed ID: 15192279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Detection of disease genes by use of family data. II. Application to nuclear families.
Tu IP; Balise RR; Whittemore AS
Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1341-50. PubMed ID: 10739759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Determining trait locus position from multipoint analysis: accuracy and power of three different statistics.
Greenberg DA; Abreu PC
Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 21(4):299-314. PubMed ID: 11754466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The impact of transmission-ratio distortion on allele sharing in affected sibling pairs.
Greenwood CM; Morgan K
Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jun; 66(6):2001-4. PubMed ID: 10775526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A statistical method for identification of polymorphisms that explain a linkage result.
Sun L; Cox NJ; McPeek MS
Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 70(2):399-411. PubMed ID: 11791210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Likelihood-based inference for the genetic relative risk based on affected-sibling-pair marker data.
McKnight B; Tierney C; McGorray SP; Day NE
Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):426-43. PubMed ID: 9629637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. On confidence intervals for genotype relative risks and attributable risks from case parent trio designs for candidate-gene studies.
Franke D; Philippi A; Tores F; Hager J; Ziegler A; König IR
Hum Hered; 2005; 60(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 16192736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of likelihood approaches for combined segregation and linkage analysis of a complex disease and a candidate gene marker under different ascertainment schemes.
Martinez M; Goldstein AM; O'Connell JR
Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S760-5. PubMed ID: 11793774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A unified Haseman-Elston method for testing linkage with quantitative traits.
Xu X; Weiss S; Xu X; Wei LJ
Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Oct; 67(4):1025-8. PubMed ID: 10961909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Linkage detection adaptive to linkage disequilibrium: the disequilibrium maximum-likelihood-binomial test for affected-sibship data.
Huang J; Jiang Y
Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Dec; 65(6):1741-59. PubMed ID: 10577929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A Likelihood Ratio Test for Gene-Environment Interaction Based on the Trend Effect of Genotype Under an Additive Risk Model Using the Gene-Environment Independence Assumption.
de Rochemonteix M; Napolioni V; Sanyal N; Belloy ME; Caporaso NE; Landi MT; Greicius MD; Chatterjee N; Han SS
Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Jan; 190(1):129-141. PubMed ID: 32870973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
