These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10714196)
1. Well-differentiated adenocarcinoma or dysplasia of the gastric epithelium: rationale for a new classification system. Schlemper RJ; Kato Y; Stolte M Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol; 1999; 83():62-70. PubMed ID: 10714196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. International comparability of the pathological diagnosis for early cancer of the digestive tract: Munich meeting. Schlemper RJ; Borchard F; Dixon MF; Koike M; Mueller J; Stolte M; Watanabe H J Gastroenterol; 2000; 35 Suppl 12():102-10. PubMed ID: 10779228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The new Vienna classification of epithelial neoplasia of the gastrointestinal tract: advantages and disadvantages. Stolte M Virchows Arch; 2003 Feb; 442(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 12596058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in diagnostic criteria for gastric carcinoma between Japanese and western pathologists. Schlemper RJ; Itabashi M; Kato Y; Lewin KJ; Riddell RH; Shimoda T; Sipponen P; Stolte M; Watanabe H; Takahashi H; Fujita R Lancet; 1997 Jun; 349(9067):1725-9. PubMed ID: 9193382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of mucin, p53 protein and Ki-67 expressions in gastric differentiated-type intramucosal neoplastic lesions obtained from endoscopic mucosal resection samples: a proposal for a new classification of intramucosal neoplastic lesions based on nuclear atypia. Sugai T; Inomata M; Uesugi N; Jiao YF; Endoh M; Orii S; Nakamura S Pathol Int; 2004 Jun; 54(6):425-35. PubMed ID: 15144402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences in diagnostic criteria for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma between Japanese and Western pathologists. Schlemper RJ; Dawsey SM; Itabashi M; Iwashita A; Kato Y; Koike M; Lewin KJ; Riddell RH; Shimoda T; Sipponen P; Stolte M; Watanabe H Cancer; 2000 Mar; 88(5):996-1006. PubMed ID: 10699887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic criteria for gastrointestinal carcinomas in Japan and Western countries: proposal for a new classification system of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Schlemper RJ; Kato Y; Stolte M J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2000 Oct; 15 Suppl():G49-57. PubMed ID: 11100994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraglandular necrotic debris in gastric biopsy and surgical specimens. Watanabe Y; Shimizu M; Itoh T; Nagashima K Ann Diagn Pathol; 2001 Jun; 5(3):141-7. PubMed ID: 11436167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Polyps in the gastrointestinal tract: discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsies and resected specimens. Sung HY; Cheung DY; Cho SH; Kim JI; Park SH; Han JY; Park GS; Kim JK; Chung IS Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Feb; 21(2):190-5. PubMed ID: 19092673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Poor interobserver agreement in the distinction of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in pretreatment Barrett's esophagus biopsies. Downs-Kelly E; Mendelin JE; Bennett AE; Castilla E; Henricks WH; Schoenfield L; Skacel M; Yerian L; Rice TW; Rybicki LA; Bronner MP; Goldblum JR Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Sep; 103(9):2333-40; quiz 2341. PubMed ID: 18671819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Review of histological classifications of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: differences in diagnosis of early carcinomas between Japanese and Western pathologists. Schlemper RJ; Kato Y; Stolte M J Gastroenterol; 2001 Jul; 36(7):445-56. PubMed ID: 11480788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flat gastric polyps: results of forceps biopsy, endoscopic mucosal resection, and long-term follow-up. Szalóki T; Tóth V; Tiszlavicz L; Czakó L Scand J Gastroenterol; 2006 Sep; 41(9):1105-9. PubMed ID: 16938725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differences in the diagnostic criteria used by Japanese and Western pathologists to diagnose colorectal carcinoma. Schlemper RJ; Itabashi M; Kato Y; Lewin KJ; Riddell RH; Shimoda T; Sipponen P; Stolte M; Watanabe H Cancer; 1998 Jan; 82(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 9428480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Grading of dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus: substantial interobserver variation between general and gastrointestinal pathologists. Kerkhof M; van Dekken H; Steyerberg EW; Meijer GA; Mulder AH; de Bruïne A; Driessen A; ten Kate FJ; Kusters JG; Kuipers EJ; Siersema PD; Histopathology; 2007 Jun; 50(7):920-7. PubMed ID: 17543082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk of high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma in gastric biopsy-proven low-grade dysplasia: an analysis using the Vienna classification. Cho SJ; Choi IJ; Kim CG; Lee JY; Kook MC; Park S; Ryu KW; Lee JH; Kim YW Endoscopy; 2011 Jun; 43(6):465-71. PubMed ID: 21425043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The pathology of epithelial pre-malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract. Guindi M; Riddell RH Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2001 Apr; 15(2):191-210. PubMed ID: 11355911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gastric dysplasia: the Padova international classification. Rugge M; Correa P; Dixon MF; Hattori T; Leandro G; Lewin K; Riddell RH; Sipponen P; Watanabe H Am J Surg Pathol; 2000 Feb; 24(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 10680883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histological classification of gastric adenocarcinoma for epidemiological research: concordance between pathologists. Shibata A; Longacre TA; Puligandla B; Parsonnet J; Habel LA Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2001 Jan; 10(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 11205493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]