205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10714374)
1. Outcome of women referred to colposcopy for persistently inadequate smears.
Sen C; Brett MT
Cytopathology; 2000 Feb; 11(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 10714374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical disease in women referred to colposcopy following inadequate smears.
Hollingworth J; Kotecha K; Dobbs SP; Shaw PA; Ireland D
Cytopathology; 2000 Feb; 11(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 10714375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in the management of women with abnormal Pap smears. Experience of a colposcopy referral clinic.
Ciotti M; Sesti F; Paba P; Benedetto A; Patrizi L; Criscuolo A; Piccione E; Branca M; Syrjänen K; Favalli C
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2004; 25(5):577-84. PubMed ID: 15493169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical screening: management of patients referred for colposcopy with smear abnormalities less severe than dyskaryosis.
Usman F; Hammond R
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 9577736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for cervical abnormalities: comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and frequency of referral.
Kulasingam SL; Hughes JP; Kiviat NB; Mao C; Weiss NS; Kuypers JM; Koutsky LA
JAMA; 2002 Oct; 288(14):1749-57. PubMed ID: 12365959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of alternative triage strategies for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Kim JJ; Wright TC; Goldie SJ
JAMA; 2002 May; 287(18):2382-90. PubMed ID: 11988059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identifying women with cervical neoplasia: using human papillomavirus DNA testing for equivocal Papanicolaou results.
Manos MM; Kinney WK; Hurley LB; Sherman ME; Shieh-Ngai J; Kurman RJ; Ransley JE; Fetterman BJ; Hartinger JS; McIntosh KM; Pawlick GF; Hiatt RA
JAMA; 1999 May; 281(17):1605-10. PubMed ID: 10235153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benefit and burden in the Dutch cytology-based vs high-risk human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening program.
Loopik DL; Koenjer LM; Siebers AG; Melchers WJG; Bekkers RLM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 224(2):200.e1-200.e9. PubMed ID: 32800820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening for high-grade cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia and cancer by testing for high-risk HPV, routine cytology or colposcopy.
Schneider A; Hoyer H; Lotz B; Leistritza S; Kühne-Heid R; Nindl I; Müller B; Haerting J; Dürst M
Int J Cancer; 2000 Nov; 89(6):529-34. PubMed ID: 11102899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abnormal pap smears in adolescents.
Bacon J; Francoeur D; Goldfarb AF; Breech LL
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 16(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 12804941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Health technology assessment report: HPV DNA based primary screening for cervical cancer precursors].
Ronco G; Biggeri A; Confortini M; Naldoni C; Segnan N; Sideri M; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Calvia M; Accetta G; Giordano L; Cogo C; Carozzi F; Gillio Tos A; Arbyn M; Mejier CJ; Snijders PJ; Cuzick J; Giorgi Rossi P
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(3-4 Suppl 1):e1-72. PubMed ID: 22828243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with atypical squamous or glandular cells of undetermined significance cytology: a prospective study.
Wensveen C; Kagie M; Veldhuizen R; De Groot C; Denny L; Zwinderman K; Trimbos B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2003 Sep; 82(9):883-9. PubMed ID: 12911453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2-3 using risk assessment and human papillomavirus testing in women with atypia on papanicolaou smears.
Shlay JC; Dunn T; Byers T; Barón AE; Douglas JM
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 96(3):410-6. PubMed ID: 10960635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Results and cost evaluation of triage with high risk HPV test in cervical cancer screening. A pilot study in Piedmont (North-West Italy)].
Magnani C; Gillio Tos A; De Marco L; Calvia M; Cipelletti A; Bestagini P; Pagano E; Segnan N; Ronco G
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 22706358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Design and methods of the evaluation of an HPV-based cervical cancer screening strategy in Mexico: The Morelos HPV Study.
Flores Y; Shah K; Lazcano E; Hernández M; Bishai D; Ferris DG; Lörincz A; Hernández P; Salmerón J;
Salud Publica Mex; 2002; 44(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 12216521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of a high-risk human papillomavirus DNA test as the primary test in a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based cohort study.
Zorzi M; Del Mistro A; Farruggio A; de'Bartolomeis L; Frayle-Salamanca H; Baboci L; Bertazzo A; Cocco P; Fedato C; Gennaro M; Marchi N; Penon MG; Cogo C; Ferro A
BJOG; 2013 Sep; 120(10):1260-7; discussion 1267-8. PubMed ID: 23786222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost and effectiveness comparison of immediate colposcopy versus human papillomavirus DNA testing in management of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Turkish women.
Kececioglu M; Seckin B; Baser E; Togrul C; Kececioglu TS; Cicek MN; Gungor T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(1):511-4. PubMed ID: 23534785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Human papillomavirus test with cytology triage in organized screening for cervical cancer.
Veijalainen O; Kares S; Kujala P; Tirkkonen M; Vuento R; Kholová I; Luukkaala T; Osuala V; Mäenpää J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Nov; 95(11):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 27591407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Wait-and-see policy versus loop excision after two consecutive Pap-2 cervical smears: over time less surgery and an equivalent outcome; no substantial contribution to be expected from the detection of high risk human papillomavirus].
Bekkers RL; Hanselaar AG; Melchers WJ; van Schaik JH; Boonstra H; Massuger LF
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Feb; 147(7):302-6. PubMed ID: 12622008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
