BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10714638)

  • 1. The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis.
    Hodgson NC; Malthaner RA; Ostbye T
    Ann Surg; 2000 Mar; 231(3):436-42. PubMed ID: 10714638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.
    Patel SV; Paskar DD; Nelson RL; Vedula SS; Steele SR
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 11(11):CD005661. PubMed ID: 29099149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions.
    van 't Riet M; Steyerberg EW; Nellensteyn J; Bonjer HJ; Jeekel J
    Br J Surg; 2002 Nov; 89(11):1350-6. PubMed ID: 12390373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incisional hernia after laparotomy: prospective randomized comparison between early-absorbable and late-absorbable suture materials.
    Hsiao WC; Young KC; Wang ST; Lin PW
    World J Surg; 2000 Jun; 24(6):747-51; discussion 752. PubMed ID: 10773130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Closure of the abdominal midline fascia: meta-analysis delineates the optimal technique.
    Rucinski J; Margolis M; Panagopoulos G; Wise L
    Am Surg; 2001 May; 67(5):421-6. PubMed ID: 11379640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mesh fixation techniques in primary ventral or incisional hernia repair.
    Mathes T; Prediger B; Walgenbach M; Siegel R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 May; 5(5):CD011563. PubMed ID: 34046884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Continuous versus interrupted skin sutures for non-obstetric surgery.
    Gurusamy KS; Toon CD; Allen VB; Davidson BR
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Feb; 2014(2):CD010365. PubMed ID: 24526375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Current standards of abdominal wall closure techniques : Conventional suture techniques].
    Heger P; Pianka F; Diener MK; Mihaljevic AL
    Chirurg; 2016 Sep; 87(9):737-743. PubMed ID: 27392763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect on incisional hernia of absorbable barbed suture for midline fascial closure in minimally invasive surgery for colorectal and gastric cancers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Lee S; Han SW; Lee MR; Kim CY; Ha GW
    Trials; 2023 May; 24(1):311. PubMed ID: 37149610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Theory and practice of continuous laparotomy suture (abdominal wound dehiscence and incisional hernia)].
    Stelzner F
    Chirurg; 1988 Oct; 59(10):654-60. PubMed ID: 2973974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Closure of the abdominal fascia after clean and clean-contaminated laparotomy.
    Larsen PN; Nielsen K; Schultz A; Mejdahl S; Larsen T; Moesgaard F
    Acta Chir Scand; 1989 Sep; 155(9):461-4. PubMed ID: 2531963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Current practice of abdominal fascial closure: a survey of Ontario general surgeons.
    Hodgson NC; Malthaner RA; Ostbye T
    Can J Surg; 2001 Oct; 44(5):366-70. PubMed ID: 11603750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective single-arm clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of monofilament polydioxanone barbed suture, MONOFIX
    Pyo DH; Yun SH; Lee WY
    World J Surg; 2024 Jul; 48(7):1674-1680. PubMed ID: 38877993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Suture choice to reduce occurrence of surgical site infection, hernia, wound dehiscence and sinus/fistula: a network meta-analysis.
    Zucker BE; Simillis C; Tekkis P; Kontovounisios C
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2019 Mar; 101(3):150-161. PubMed ID: 30286645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Superiority trial for the development of an ideal method for the closure of midline abdominal wall incisions to reduce the incidence of wound complications after elective gastroenterological surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Fukai S; Mizusawa Y; Noda H; Tsujinaka S; Maeda Y; Hasebe R; Eguchi Y; Kanemitsu R; Matsuzawa N; Abe I; Endo Y; Fukui T; Takayama Y; Ichida K; Inoue K; Muto Y; Watanabe F; Futsuhara K; Miyakura Y; Rikiyama T
    Trials; 2024 May; 25(1):327. PubMed ID: 38760769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Controlled clinical trial of three suture materials for abdominal wall closure after bowl operations.
    Corman ML; Veidenheimer MC; Coller JA
    Am J Surg; 1981 Apr; 141(4):510-13. PubMed ID: 6452825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monofilament versus multifilament absorbable sutures for abdominal closure.
    Sahlin S; Ahlberg J; Granström L; Ljungström KG
    Br J Surg; 1993 Mar; 80(3):322-4. PubMed ID: 8472140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Evaluation of Fascial Closure Techniques in Open Ventral Hernia Repair: Practice Patterns and Short-Term Outcomes.
    Fox SS; Huang LC; Hooks WB; Fischer JP; Hope WW
    Am Surg; 2019 Nov; 85(11):1213-1218. PubMed ID: 31775961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Continuous absorbable vs interrupted nonabsorbable fascial closure. A prospective, randomized comparison.
    McNeil PM; Sugerman HJ
    Arch Surg; 1986 Jul; 121(7):821-3. PubMed ID: 3013123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meta-analysis on Materials and Techniques for Laparotomy Closure: The MATCH Review.
    Henriksen NA; Deerenberg EB; Venclauskas L; Fortelny RH; Miserez M; Muysoms FE
    World J Surg; 2018 Jun; 42(6):1666-1678. PubMed ID: 29322212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.