These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10715276)
1. Qualification of the concepts of unqualified success and unmitigated failure. Kessler KM Circulation; 2000 Mar; 101(10):E98; author reply E99. PubMed ID: 10715276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Qualification of the concepts of unqualified success and unmitigated failure. Francis DP; Davies LC; Coats AJ Circulation; 2000 Mar; 101(10):E99. PubMed ID: 10715277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reporting risks and benefits of therapy by use of the concepts of unqualified success and unmitigated failure: applications to highly cited trials in cardiovascular medicine. Mancini GB; Schulzer M Circulation; 1999 Jan; 99(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 9918524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 'Unqualified success' and 'unmitigated failure': number-needed-to-treat-related concepts for assessing treatment efficacy in the presence of treatment-induced adverse events. Schulzer M; Mancini GB Int J Epidemiol; 1996 Aug; 25(4):704-12. PubMed ID: 8921446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Commentary on the risk and benefit of aspirin therapy: an application of the concepts of unqualified success and unmitigated failure. Cragg JJ; Schulzer M; Mancini GB J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jul; 66(7):803-5. PubMed ID: 23523548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Composite outcomes in clinical trials: what are they and when should they be used? Heddle NM; Cook RJ Transfusion; 2011 Jan; 51(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 21219322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The clinical significance of new therapies for the management of periodontal disease. Van Dyke TE J Int Acad Periodontol; 2005 Oct; 7(4 Suppl):191-6. PubMed ID: 16248275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Standardizing end points in perioperative trials: towards a core and extended outcome set. Myles PS; Grocott MP; Boney O; Moonesinghe SR; Br J Anaesth; 2016 May; 116(5):586-9. PubMed ID: 27106961 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Review of the Task Force Report on PRO data collection in clinical trials using mixed modes. McLeod L Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):491-2. PubMed ID: 25128040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Patients are urged to boycott trials that do not guarantee publication. Kmietowicz Z BMJ; 2013 Jan; 346():f106. PubMed ID: 23299902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale: a systematic review. Quinn TJ; Dawson J; Walters MR; Lees KR Stroke; 2009 Oct; 40(10):3393-5. PubMed ID: 19679846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of occipital nerve stimulation in studies of chronic migraine and broader implications of social media in clinical trials. Goadsby PJ Cephalalgia; 2013 Feb; 33(3):214-5. PubMed ID: 23212293 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of generalisability in trials of health interventions: suggested framework and systematic review. Bonell C; Oakley A; Hargreaves J; Strange V; Rees R BMJ; 2006 Aug; 333(7563):346-9. PubMed ID: 16902217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistics and the relationship of clinical research to clinical practice. Khuder SA; Kahaleh B J Rheumatol; 2009 Feb; 36(2):219-20. PubMed ID: 19208555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Validity of clinical trials: are there differences between conventional and complementary alternative medicine?]. Porzsolt F; Linde K; Witt C; Mühlhauser I; Runkel F; Habs M Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 Jul; 135(30):1503-6. PubMed ID: 20648411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]