These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10715925)

  • 1. Efficacy of preformed metal crowns vs. amalgam restorations in primary molars: a systematic review.
    Randall RC; Vrijhoef MM; Wilson NH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Mar; 131(3):337-43. PubMed ID: 10715925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Teeth with large amalgam restorations and crowns: factors affecting the receipt of subsequent treatment after 10 years.
    Kolker JL; Damiano PC; Caplan DJ; Armstrong SR; Dawson DV; Jones MP; Flach SD; Warren JJ; Kuthy RA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Jun; 136(6):738-48; quiz 805-6. PubMed ID: 16022038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The fate and survival of amalgam and preformed crown molar restorations placed in a specialist paediatric dental practice.
    Roberts JF; Sherriff M
    Br Dent J; 1990 Oct; 169(8):237-44. PubMed ID: 2147106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of amalgam and stainless steel restorations for primary molars.
    Dawson LR; Simon JF; Taylor PP
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1981; 48(6):420-2. PubMed ID: 6946083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth.
    Hickel R; Kaaden C; Paschos E; Buerkle V; García-Godoy F; Manhart J
    Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):198-211. PubMed ID: 16158813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Longevity of 2- and 3-surface restorations in posterior teeth of 25- to 30-year-olds attending Public Dental Service-A 13-year observation.
    Palotie U; Eronen AK; Vehkalahti K; Vehkalahti MM
    J Dent; 2017 Jul; 62():13-17. PubMed ID: 28529175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth.
    Van Nieuwenhuysen JP; D'Hoore W; Carvalho J; Qvist V
    J Dent; 2003 Aug; 31(6):395-405. PubMed ID: 12878022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preformed metal crowns for primary and permanent molar teeth: review of the literature.
    Randall RC
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):489-500. PubMed ID: 12412964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survival of extensive restorations in primary molars: 15-year practice-based study.
    Tseveenjav B; Furuholm J; Mulic A; Valen H; Maisala T; Turunen S; Varsio S; Auero M; Tjäderhane L
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2018 Mar; 28(2):249-256. PubMed ID: 29205613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of replacement rates for posterior resin-based composite and amalgam restorations in U.S. Navy and marine corps recruits.
    Simecek JW; Diefenderfer KE; Cohen ME
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):200-9; quiz 249. PubMed ID: 19188417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survival analysis of complete veneer crowns vs. multisurface restorations: a dental school patient population.
    Janus CE; Unger JW; Best AM
    J Dent Educ; 2006 Oct; 70(10):1098-104. PubMed ID: 17021290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of restorations in primary molars.
    Papathanasiou AG; Curzon ME; Fairpo CG
    Pediatr Dent; 1994; 16(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 7937261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stainless steel crown versus multisurface amalgam restorations: an 8-year longitudinal clinical study.
    Einwag J; Dünninger P
    Quintessence Int; 1996 May; 27(5):321-3. PubMed ID: 8941814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term survival of extensive amalgam restorations.
    Plasmans PJ; Creugers NH; Mulder J
    J Dent Res; 1998 Mar; 77(3):453-60. PubMed ID: 9496918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison between stainless steel crowns and multisurface amalgams in primary molars.
    Braff MH
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1975; 42(6):474-8. PubMed ID: 1107373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial.
    Bernardo M; Luis H; Martin MD; Leroux BG; Rue T; Leitão J; DeRouen TA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Jun; 138(6):775-83. PubMed ID: 17545266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Placement and replacement rates of amalgam and composite restorations on posterior teeth in a military population.
    Owen BD; Guevara PH; Greenwood W
    US Army Med Dep J; 2017; (2-17):88-94. PubMed ID: 28853125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial.
    Soncini JA; Maserejian NN; Trachtenberg F; Tavares M; Hayes C
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Jun; 138(6):763-72. PubMed ID: 17545265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A study of primary teeth restored by intracoronal restorations in children participating in an undergraduate teaching programme at Cork University Dental School and Hospital, Ireland.
    Hurley E; Da Mata C; Stewart C; Kinirons M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 25793959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
    Webman M; Mulki E; Roldan R; Arevalo O; Roberts JF; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.