These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10716219)

  • 1. Electrophysiological evidence for sequential activation of multiple brain regions during the auditory selective attention process in humans.
    Kasai K; Nakagome K; Itoh K; Koshida I; Fukuda M; Watanabe A; Kamio S; Murakami T; Hata A; Iwanami A; Hiramatsu KI; Kato N
    Neuroreport; 1999 Dec; 10(18):3837-42. PubMed ID: 10716219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple generators in the auditory automatic discrimination process in humans.
    Kasai K; Nakagome K; Itoh K; Koshida I; Hata A; Iwanami A; Fukuda M; Hiramatsu KI; Kato N
    Neuroreport; 1999 Aug; 10(11):2267-71. PubMed ID: 10439446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brain electric activity for active inhibition of auditory irrelevant information.
    Araki T; Kasai K; Nakagome K; Fukuda M; Itoh K; Koshida I; Kato N; Iwanami A
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Feb; 374(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 15631887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brain potential signs of feature processing during auditory selective attention.
    Woods DL; Alho K; Algazi A
    Neuroreport; 1991 Apr; 2(4):189-92. PubMed ID: 1893092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of visual attentional load on auditory processing.
    Otten LJ; Alain C; Picton TW
    Neuroreport; 2000 Mar; 11(4):875-80. PubMed ID: 10757537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of eye position on event-related potentials during auditory selective attention.
    Okita T; Wei JH
    Psychophysiology; 1993 Jul; 30(4):359-65. PubMed ID: 8327621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid extraction of auditory feature contingencies.
    Bendixen A; Prinz W; Horváth J; Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Schröger E
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jul; 41(3):1111-9. PubMed ID: 18467129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 'Time-shrinking perception' in the visual system: a psychophysical and high-density ERP study.
    Nagaike A; Mitsudo T; Nakajima Y; Ogata K; Yamasaki T; Goto Y; Tobimatsu S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 234(11):3279-3290. PubMed ID: 27401472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-modal processing of auditory-visual stimuli in a no-task paradigm: a topographic event-related potential study.
    Vidal J; Giard MH; Roux S; Barthélémy C; Bruneau N
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Apr; 119(4):763-71. PubMed ID: 18289935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of auditory attention measured from human electrocorticograms.
    Neelon MF; Williams J; Garell PC
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Mar; 117(3):504-21. PubMed ID: 16458596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scalp topographies dissociate N1 and Nd components during auditory selective attention.
    Woods DL; Clayworth CC
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1987; 40():155-60. PubMed ID: 3480116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feature binding in auditory modality requires attention as indexed by mismatch negativity and N2b in an active discrimination task.
    Lazarev IE; Sayfulina KE; Chernysheva EG; Bryzgalov DV; Chernyshev BV
    Neuroreport; 2018 Mar; 29(4):308-313. PubMed ID: 29293173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distinct neural responses to chord violations: a multiple source analysis study.
    Garza Villarreal EA; Brattico E; Leino S; Ostergaard L; Vuust P
    Brain Res; 2011 May; 1389():103-14. PubMed ID: 21382359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attending points in time and space.
    Lange K; Krämer UM; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 173(1):130-40. PubMed ID: 16506009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Personal significance is encoded automatically by the human brain: an event-related potential study with ringtones.
    Roye A; Jacobsen T; Schröger E
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Aug; 26(3):784-90. PubMed ID: 17634070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identifying auditory attention with ear-EEG: cEEGrid versus high-density cap-EEG comparison.
    Bleichner MG; Mirkovic B; Debener S
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Dec; 13(6):066004. PubMed ID: 27705963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Application of simultaneous auditory evoked potentials and functional magnetic resonance recordings for examination of central auditory system--preliminary results].
    Milner R; Rusiniak M; Wolak T; Piatkowska-Janko E; Naumczyk P; Bogorodzki P; Senderski A; Ganc M; Skarzyński H
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2011; 65(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 21916216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Crossmodal and intermodal attention modulate event-related brain potentials to tactile and auditory stimuli.
    Hötting K; Rösler F; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Jan; 148(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 12478394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What is common to brain activity evoked by the perception of visual and auditory filled durations? A study with MEG and EEG co-recordings.
    N'Diaye K; Ragot R; Garnero L; Pouthas V
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 21(2):250-68. PubMed ID: 15464356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.