These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Effects of eye position on event-related potentials during auditory selective attention. Okita T; Wei JH Psychophysiology; 1993 Jul; 30(4):359-65. PubMed ID: 8327621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rapid extraction of auditory feature contingencies. Bendixen A; Prinz W; Horváth J; Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Schröger E Neuroimage; 2008 Jul; 41(3):1111-9. PubMed ID: 18467129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 'Time-shrinking perception' in the visual system: a psychophysical and high-density ERP study. Nagaike A; Mitsudo T; Nakajima Y; Ogata K; Yamasaki T; Goto Y; Tobimatsu S Exp Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 234(11):3279-3290. PubMed ID: 27401472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cross-modal processing of auditory-visual stimuli in a no-task paradigm: a topographic event-related potential study. Vidal J; Giard MH; Roux S; Barthélémy C; Bruneau N Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Apr; 119(4):763-71. PubMed ID: 18289935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of auditory attention measured from human electrocorticograms. Neelon MF; Williams J; Garell PC Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Mar; 117(3):504-21. PubMed ID: 16458596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scalp topographies dissociate N1 and Nd components during auditory selective attention. Woods DL; Clayworth CC Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1987; 40():155-60. PubMed ID: 3480116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Feature binding in auditory modality requires attention as indexed by mismatch negativity and N2b in an active discrimination task. Lazarev IE; Sayfulina KE; Chernysheva EG; Bryzgalov DV; Chernyshev BV Neuroreport; 2018 Mar; 29(4):308-313. PubMed ID: 29293173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attending points in time and space. Lange K; Krämer UM; Röder B Exp Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 173(1):130-40. PubMed ID: 16506009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Personal significance is encoded automatically by the human brain: an event-related potential study with ringtones. Roye A; Jacobsen T; Schröger E Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Aug; 26(3):784-90. PubMed ID: 17634070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identifying auditory attention with ear-EEG: cEEGrid versus high-density cap-EEG comparison. Bleichner MG; Mirkovic B; Debener S J Neural Eng; 2016 Dec; 13(6):066004. PubMed ID: 27705963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Application of simultaneous auditory evoked potentials and functional magnetic resonance recordings for examination of central auditory system--preliminary results]. Milner R; Rusiniak M; Wolak T; Piatkowska-Janko E; Naumczyk P; Bogorodzki P; Senderski A; Ganc M; Skarzyński H Otolaryngol Pol; 2011; 65(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 21916216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Crossmodal and intermodal attention modulate event-related brain potentials to tactile and auditory stimuli. Hötting K; Rösler F; Röder B Exp Brain Res; 2003 Jan; 148(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 12478394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What is common to brain activity evoked by the perception of visual and auditory filled durations? A study with MEG and EEG co-recordings. N'Diaye K; Ragot R; Garnero L; Pouthas V Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 21(2):250-68. PubMed ID: 15464356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention. Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]