BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10716304)

  • 1. The pap-smear history of women with invasive cervical squamous carcinoma. A case-control study from Sweden.
    Andersson-Ellström A; Seidal T; Grannas M; Hagmar B
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Mar; 79(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 10716304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
    Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A longitudinal Swedish study on screening for squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma: evidence of effectiveness and overtreatment.
    Gunnell AS; Ylitalo N; Sandin S; Sparén P; Adami HO; Ripatti S
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Dec; 16(12):2641-8. PubMed ID: 18086769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk of invasive cervical cancer in relation to management of abnormal Pap smear results.
    Silfverdal L; Kemetli L; Andrae B; Sparén P; Ryd W; Dillner J; Strander B; Törnberg S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Aug; 201(2):188.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19560117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after three consecutive negative Pap smears.
    Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
    J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 14738657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives.
    Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pap smear screening history of women with squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix.
    Pak SC; Martens M; Bekkers R; Crandon AJ; Land R; Nicklin JL; Perrin LC; Obermair A
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Dec; 47(6):504-7. PubMed ID: 17991118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pap test--with or without vaginal smear?
    Milicić-Juhas V; Perić M; Pajtler M; Prvulović I; Curzik D
    Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 20437636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A case-control study of the protective benefit of cervical screening against invasive cervical cancer in NSW women.
    Yang B; Morrell S; Zuo Y; Roder D; Tracey E; Jelfs P
    Cancer Causes Control; 2008 Aug; 19(6):569-76. PubMed ID: 18286380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening for cervical disease in mature women: strategies for improvement.
    Colgan TJ; Clarke A; Hakh N; Seidenfeld A
    Cancer; 2002 Aug; 96(4):195-203. PubMed ID: 12209660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
    Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Papanicolaou smear history and diagnosis of invasive cervical carcinoma among members of a large prepaid health plan.
    Sung HY; Kearney KA; Miller M; Kinney W; Sawaya GF; Hiatt RA
    Cancer; 2000 May; 88(10):2283-9. PubMed ID: 10820350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improvement in protection against adenocarcinoma of the cervix resulting from participation in cervical screening.
    Mitchell H; Hocking J; Saville M
    Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):336-41. PubMed ID: 14681940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The cytological screening turned out effective also for adenocarcinoma: a population-based case-control study in Trento, Italy.
    Crocetti E; Battisti L; Betta A; Palma PD; Paci E; Piffer S; Pojer A; Polla E; Zappa M
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2007 Dec; 16(6):564-7. PubMed ID: 18090131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 1991 cervical screening recommendations: a working group report.
    Paul C; Bagshaw S; Bonita R; Durham G; Fitzgerald NW; Jones RW; Marshall B; McAvoy BR
    N Z Med J; 1991 Jul; 104(915):291-5. PubMed ID: 1906587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the effect of Papanicolaou screening in Sweden: record linkage between a central screening registry and the National Cancer Registry.
    Pettersson F; Näslund I; Malker B
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):91-105. PubMed ID: 3570419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
    Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A
    BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Profile of Pap smear cytology in the Western region of Saudi Arabia.
    Jamal A; Al-Maghrabi JA
    Saudi Med J; 2003 Nov; 24(11):1225-9. PubMed ID: 14647558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process.
    Leyden WA; Manos MM; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Mouchawar J; Bischoff K; Yood MU; Gilbert J; Taplin SH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(9):675-83. PubMed ID: 15870438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cytopathological pattern of cervical Pap smear according to the Bethesda system in Southwestern Saudi Arabia.
    Elhakeem HA; Al-Ghamdi AS; Al-Maghrabi JA
    Saudi Med J; 2005 Apr; 26(4):588-92. PubMed ID: 15900366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.