These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10716650)

  • 1. Practical and theoretical issues in gene-targeting studies and their application to behaviour.
    Hagan JJ; Harper AJ; Elliott H; Jones DN; Rogers DC
    Rev Neurosci; 2000; 11(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 10716650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The genes and brains of mice and men.
    Tecott LH
    Am J Psychiatry; 2003 Apr; 160(4):646-56. PubMed ID: 12668350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No effect of prenatal vitamin D deficiency on autism-relevant behaviours in multiple inbred strains of mice.
    Langguth M; Fassin M; Alexander S; Turner KM; Burne THJ
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Aug; 348():42-52. PubMed ID: 29655594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Standardized experiments in mutant mice reveal behavioural similarity on 129S5 and C57BL/6J backgrounds.
    van de Lagemaat LN; Stanford LE; Pettit CM; Strathdee DJ; Strathdee KE; Elsegood KA; Fricker DG; Croning MD; Komiyama NH; Grant SG
    Genes Brain Behav; 2017 Apr; 16(4):409-418. PubMed ID: 27886459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mice, gene targeting and behaviour: more than just genetic background.
    Lathe R
    Trends Neurosci; 1996 May; 19(5):183-6; discussion 188-9. PubMed ID: 8723202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Similar recent selection criteria associated with different behavioural effects in two dog breeds.
    Sundman AS; Johnsson M; Wright D; Jensen P
    Genes Brain Behav; 2016 Nov; 15(8):750-756. PubMed ID: 27520587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gene targeting: technical confounds and potential solutions in behavioral brain research.
    Gerlai R
    Behav Brain Res; 2001 Nov; 125(1-2):13-21. PubMed ID: 11682088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hippocampal gene expression profiling across eight mouse inbred strains: towards understanding the molecular basis for behaviour.
    Fernandes C; Paya-Cano JL; Sluyter F; D'Souza U; Plomin R; Schalkwyk LC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 May; 19(9):2576-82. PubMed ID: 15128411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Behavioural phenotyping of transgenic mice.
    Brown RE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):328-44. PubMed ID: 18266509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Post-traumatic stress behavioural responses in inbred mouse strains: can genetic predisposition explain phenotypic vulnerability?
    Cohen H; Geva AB; Matar MA; Zohar J; Kaplan Z
    Int J Neuropsychopharmacol; 2008 May; 11(3):331-49. PubMed ID: 17655807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of SHIRPA to characterise the phenotype of gene-targeted mice.
    Hatcher JP; Jones DN; Rogers DC; Hatcher PD; Reavill C; Hagan JJ; Hunter AJ
    Behav Brain Res; 2001 Nov; 125(1-2):43-7. PubMed ID: 11682092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Boldness and aggressiveness in early and late hatched three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus.
    Ruiz-Gomez ML; Huntingford FA
    J Fish Biol; 2012 Aug; 81(3):966-76. PubMed ID: 22880730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Behavioural testing of standard inbred and 5HT(1B) knockout mice: implications of absent corpus callosum.
    Wahlsten D; Crabbe JC; Dudek BC
    Behav Brain Res; 2001 Nov; 125(1-2):23-32. PubMed ID: 11682089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of SHIRPA and discriminant analysis to characterise marked differences in the behavioural phenotype of six inbred mouse strains.
    Rogers DC; Jones DN; Nelson PR; Jones CM; Quilter CA; Robinson TL; Hagan JJ
    Behav Brain Res; 1999 Nov; 105(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 10563494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mouse phenome research: implications of genetic background.
    Yoshiki A; Moriwaki K
    ILAR J; 2006; 47(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 16547366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Demystifying animal 'personality' (or not): why individual variation matters to experimental biologists.
    Roche DG; Careau V; Binning SA
    J Exp Biol; 2016 Dec; 219(Pt 24):3832-3843. PubMed ID: 27852750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Similar patterns of frequency-dependent selection on animal personalities emerge in three species of social spiders.
    Lichtenstein JL; Pruitt JN
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Jun; 28(6):1248-56. PubMed ID: 25940218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Issues and solutions of conditional gene targeting].
    Lin FY; Yang X
    Yi Chuan; 2011 May; 33(5):469-84. PubMed ID: 21586394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Mutant Mouse Behaviour network, a medium to present and discuss methods for the behavioural phenotyping.
    Surjo D; Arndt SS
    Physiol Behav; 2001 Aug; 73(5):691-4. PubMed ID: 11566203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A behavioural characterisation of the FVB/N mouse strain.
    Pugh PL; Ahmed SF; Smith MI; Upton N; Hunter AJ
    Behav Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 155(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 15364488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.